Hundreds of Beavers Review


One of the best comedies I have seen for ages. A slapstick comedy that blends an old-school feeling of cartoonish fun while also finding a creative track. Hundreds of Beavers is the directorial debut by Mike Cheslik.  It was filmed with a budget of just six digits with 5 digits just for the costumes. Although it may be a limited budget film, it kills with loads of laughs and is a surreal good time. The film takes place in the 19th century with a story of intentional misdirection where situations of trial and error keep its audience keen to the tunes of the cleverness. A masterpiece that I admire, and it is unforgettable.

Hundreds of Beavers takes place in a winter forest. The cinematography is black-and-white and the film has very little to no dialogue. It focuses on Jean Kayak (played by Ryland Brickson Cole Tews). Jean is an applejack salesman and a drunk, yet he maintains a representation of class and popularity. This all changes though, when he finds himself on a detrimental course of peril in the winter forest with his biggest nemesis being beavers. In addition to that, he has to deal with the harsh and extremely cold temperatures. These beavers are the size of humans. As his journey deepens, Hundreds of Beavers becomesan experience of reverse effects—special effects are added throughout the entirety of the film. This is what makes Hundreds of Beavers hysterical. It takes the Man vs. Nature theme to the most harmonious and creative level I ever seen in an independent project.

Along with Jean, there are others in the winter forest. There is the Lady Furrier (played by Olivia Graves), the Master Fur Trapper (played by Wes Tank), The Merchant (played by Doug Manchewski), and The Indian Fur Trapper (played by Luis Rico), all of whom are puzzled by the stupidity of Jean. He is represented as the one that is faulty, however all of them are in some way. The lack of dialogue and use of facial expressions makes character interaction and development all the more intriguing.  Jean must prove himself to become one of the fur trappers against the beavers. The fact that no one will help him is where his struggle lies. The whole group in the woods is presented as a bunch of nut and Hundreds of Beavers knows how to make “nut” characters hilarious and wacky in not being so smart about nature and forests in the era of the 19th century.

The film opens with a blend of classic cartoon wonders—ones where the audience will think of icons like The Flintstones or Charlie Brown. On top of that, it has that type of cinematography that brings to mind the work of George Melies and Karl Zeman—auteur and historic film pioneers from back in the day. On top of that, the film also feels like a Charlie Chaplin classic—a character who is clumsy in an environment where there is more emphasis of meaning to his surroundings. The audacity of the film is the frequent slapstick moments with the layers of trial and error—the forest and the beavers are smarterthan their human counterparts. The special effects for the comedic moments are truly unforgettable in bringing all of these layers together.

In this winter and forest setup the miracles may not come so easily. The poetics of Hundreds of Beavers is the lack of common sense in the wilderness of the forest.  The animals have the advantage here. With that being said, I found myself thinking continuously about how often Jean is going to fall apart. What does he lack to survive in the outdoors? Why is nature smarter than him? Regardless, the bonker moments in the forest just kept making me gasp to the point where my chest was hurting from so many of the giggles that keep delivering throughout this film. There is no stopping the laughter in Hundreds of Beavers, especially when Jean has conflicts with navigating a map. His drunkenness comes back to haunt him when he must face reality. The old-cartoonish cinematography keeps on the track of an aching and fun comedy in a forestry setting.

Its setup is like Monty Python and the Holy Grail with its use of effects, In Monty Python and the Holy Grail, coconuts were banged together to sound like its characters were riding horsesbecause production did not have enough money for horses; in Hundreds of Beavers, actors were dressed as animals due to the limited budget. The lack of funds is where creativity stepped in achieving the unforgettable laughter that develops in Hundreds of Beavers. Four out of four stars for Hundreds of Beavers.

The Beast Review


In this film, the future is full of imagined tensions enhanced by artificial intelligence. The direction is pure in portraying human emotions. The writing seems strong and science-based, but gets blurrier as the story transitions. The Beast is about two individuals spanning different generations. While I’m normally a sucker for films set in the future which require audiences to think, I left feeling this movie confused. In short, the film dives into too many different timelines and too many emotions. Frequently, I asked myself, what is the correlation?  Where is the logic? Although there is some artistic value in the film, there is even more melancholy.

The film begins in a future setting where artificial intelligence takes control of people’s minds and lives. The two individuals in this bizarre premise are Gabrielle and Louis (played by Lea Seydoux and George Mackay). They are acquainted with love and relationships in the years 1910, 2014, and 2044. During each period, their relationship status differs. In one generation, they are in love. And, in another generation they are in turmoil. Finally, in yet another generation, they are strangers. The Beastis a tense experimental film. The focus on artificial intelligence leads to some visual brilliance, but the entire film is not executed effectively.

Its limiting factor is that the film keeps drifting back and forth. The dynamic remains serious as The Beast has plenty of turmoil played out in different generations. Still, there is confusion as audiences try to figure out how the eras correlate in these shifting universes.  Love and faith shift yet remain unclear due to  the film’s lack of continuity, The Beast goes down the rabbit hole without clearly evolving.  

Love is lost in turmoil and peril making the fate of the coupleinevitable in The Beast. The film paints a disastrous picture of judgment in the relationship between Gabrielle and Louis. At one point during the 2014 era, Louis says, “I deserve girls!” During that time, they are complete strangers and somehow get acquainted. However, the film’s transition is just a mess createdby a lack of supporting information to explain the events which occur.

There is further confusion when Gabrielle goes back and forth in a mind study in which Louis is also looped in. The Beast tries to convey a message to boost its sci-fi value by including surreal technical and artistic elements. The writing in support of the plot does not do justice to the film’s scenes. I felt repeatedly dissatisfied during the film. At certain points, I was amazed but then again exhausted as I tried to put pieces in the different time periods together.

The personalities and behaviors of Gabrielle and Louis are divergent in the different generations of The Beast. It is asuspenseful thriller which is weakened due to misdirection on a journey to find a futuristic climax. Overall, it was not a terrible experience, but it left me exhausted and wanting for a rewind button. Two out four stars for The Beast.

Arcadian Review


Arcadian is a surreal film in an apocalyptic setting where there is a sense of disconnect and confusion, but the terror is not the emphasis. The focus of the film is how the deceased world impacts a father and his two sons. Arcadian is a film in whichthe father-figure role fits Nicolas Cage. He portrays a man withserious mindset who takes life into his own hands all day, every day. Cage plays the role as a survivalist father well in this film.  However, the film suffers due to what appears to be rushed writing. Directed by Benjamin Brewer, the realities of peril in this story struggle to find peace in Arcadian.

The film takes place in a primitive land of solitude. The movie was filmed in Dublin, Ireland. Cage plays Paul, the father of twin boys.  The boys are Joseph, played by Jaeden Martell, and Thomas, played by Maxwell Jenkins. They live in a remote farmhouse where the days are very structured.  They have scheduled times to complete their outside tasks and various other responsibilities throughout the day. At night they board up their home, have dinner, and go to sleep. While living in a world where much has been lost, Paul raises his sons in a life where there is no enchantment or bright days of hope. At night, they must lock up. If they do not take precautions, creatures outside their home can put an end to their lives. Not only are Paul and his sons tormented by the creatures that roam at night, but everyone around them is also tormented. Paul tries to prepare Joseph and Thomas to be ready to fight every day of their lives, because one wrong move could be fatal.

The life of solitude and specific repetitive tasks throughout the twins’ childhood plays a major part in the film’s sadness and moments of disconnect. The writing is faithful in finding the roots of conflict between Joseph and Thomas. Joseph is introverted, and Thomas is extraverted. Their father cannot make exceptions for how he has their home lives set up. Paul is intensely strict and focused on safety out of love for them. How long can they all tolerate this way of life? Their family dynamicwhich involves detrimental disagreements and challenges of Paul’s authority gets heated during several scenes in Arcadian.

Everyday frustrations and wishes for normalcy are criticalfactors in this film. There are gaps in the family that may never be fulfilled…not when they live a life of daily quarantine. It makes the audience wonder how life would be if the world was different for this family. Truly, the only way to overcome the challenges they face is for them decide to fight what comes at night.

Paul’s sons are all he has and his role as a father trying to protect them leads to heightened emotions. This film about the impact of quarantine on this family is not amazing, but still worth watching. Where will there story end? Find out in Arcadian. Three out of four stars.

Treating cinema in many forms of art!