Challengers Review


This is one of the most enticing films directed by Luca Guadagnino that I have ever seen. Challengers is a film whichtests tensions and favoritism to the absolute maximum. Tennis and relationships are explored hand in hand throughout the film.  The story centers around Zendaya, she is one of the main competitors. The film focuses on competition for both a tennis championship and the attention of Zendaya. Challengers does not only push itself in terms of its mental suspense, but it is also remains on point in having its audience think about the rules of tennis and what it takes to make it to the big leagues. With its two male stars, Mike Faist and Josh O’Connor, the heat is truly on in Challengers.

The film begins in 2019. Art Donaldson (played by Faist) is a successful tennis player in a loving relationship with Tashi Donaldson (played by Zendaya). They live a life of success, commercialism, and many rankings in tennis championships. His competitor (also a long-term friend on odd terms) is Patrick Zweig (played by Josh O’Connor). Zweig is one who keeps hitting or missing in tennis competitions. He keeps finding himself in financial despair and frustration. They are all connected though, as the film jumps to the era before the hot mess began. Art and Patrick were good friends, and Tashi was one they were obsessed with. They all became very close to the point where they were all madly in love with each other. However, it is clear that the distraction and attention for Tashi also is the key to their performance on the court. Both have always had goals and ambitions to impress Tashi. With all of that, the lines get blurred for success on the court for Art and Patrick.

The film goes into a pattern where the younger days were ones of success and young love between all three individuals. As the film progresses, the competition of tennis only gets more complex and mentally challenging, because both Art and Patrick want to be great. On top of that, they all want to be in one fulfilling and loving relationship with Tashi. Tashi had gone pro but sustained an injury and has limitations. It fueled Art and Patrick to be competitive with each other in the rankings and wins throughout their tennis career. Guadagnino focuses in-depth on their clear aggravations, mentality, egos and persistence. Challengers is a daring sportsmanship experience that will stress its audience to the max with its adrenaline.

With all the turmoil and detrimental thinking among the three characters, carrying from their younger days to their current lives, they build a relationship of confusion where love, tennis, and lust lead to destruction. The film’s continuity and wicked suspense wraps around winning the love of Tashi. This element creates a layer of disconnect. Challengers draws a picture where growth has wins, losses, jealousy and halts in success–all enthralling key points in Challengers.

The relationships and thoughts of the individuals in the film made me start to think of Guadagnino’s masterpiece Call Me by Your Name. Although these are separate types of films when it comes to relationships, there is a layer of writing where his work shines brightly. His directing is one that conveys that his characters are irritated or upset, and it is keen on making surethat audiences know it. Guadagnino’s direction of leading his audience think about soul-searching in Challengers goes into many directions. Who has more faith? Who is a better man for Tashi? Why do these individuals tolerate each other’s nonsense so much?  Challengers has continuous elements of intense anddetrimental stress in its characterizations—the stressors do not stop and make the competitive nature of this film even more mesmerizing.

A boiling and athletic ride of anxiety, this film takes a deep dive into egotistical minds. Tashi is all that matters to Art and Patrick and infidelities that occur go down the path of benefiting one over the other on the tennis court. Challengers has tons of moving parts that will make its audience keep wanting to think thoroughly and precisely. It is a duel for a championship and much more. The question is who is the true champion and the one that loves Tashi the most? Is it Art or Patrick? Find out in Challengers. Four stars.

Sasquatch Sunset Review


This film opens with vast mountain scenery that represents a form of surreal solitude—the presentation looks and feels peaceful and rejuvenating. Then the film jumps to a family that is obscure—a family of sasquatch creatures. The creativity of Sasquatch Sunset is unique and fearless—the film itself feels like uncharted territory. However, I felt sold on it for the first thirty minutes, and then later I felt there were multiple blurred lines in the continuation of the film itself. Directed by David and Nathan Zellner, their attempt to create a strong form of portraying a unique environment is almost accomplished, but the line of continuity just continues to be halting.

The film is about a family of sasquatches, and they have no names. The celebrities as the sasquatches are Jesse Eisenberg, Riley Keough, Chrisotpher Zajac-Denek, and Nathan Zellner. The focus is on the life of this sasquatch family in the forest over the many different seasons. Nature takes its course to a heavy extent. There is no dialogue though, only repeated grunts, gibbers, and all kinds of animal sound effects. All of which give a pretty clear understanding though, as one of the beginning moments is where two of the sasquatch creatures engage in having a sensual moment. That scene gives off the feeling that Sasquatch Sunset could be decent, neutral, or mediocre.

With all the nature vibing, the life of the sasquatch family in Sasquatch Sunset has no clear point to give the film continuity. I felt that it was like a lighthearted version of a Planet of the Apesflick…there are just no humans or spoken language whatsoever. Its scoring and use of music is what creates the euphoric and somewhat inspiring atmosphere. The sasquatch family gets hyperactive and enthusiastic with the resources of their forest—turtles, plants, and drenches are where their positivity thrives. They may not be able to speak, but their facial expressions are their key to understanding their forms of communication for the film’s audience. How does this bizarre family of creatures find their connection? What are its writers trying to accomplish? Is their home in the forest their center of massive conflict?

My mind kept swerving back and forth with Sasquatch Sunsetcreating a blur. I thought to myself that the territory is clearly one that is taken and making the sasquatch family feel violated. If that was the case, why does the film resort to so much grunting and crazy buffoonery. “Buffoonery” in terms of how they act when they are not pleased. A lot of which I do not intend to describe, as it is on the side of grotesque. However, if the audience likes what is twisted, then they will get their money’s worth of “gross” in Sasquatch Sunset. I will say that the many behaviors made me have a clear understanding of the reasons why this film had people walking out at the Sundance Film Festival this year. It is clear this was not everyone’s cup of tea. It may be for some, but not so much for me. I will say though, I give this one credit for its different idea even though it did not find the right path of execution.

There is a moment where the sasquatch family comes across a tree and that sets off curiosity—a major layer of “curiosity” because the sasquatch family just starts eating from the tree. Then there is another tree found, and one of the sasquatches despises the taste of that second tree—animal instincts are clear and descriptive of what the underlying turmoil can be in Sasquatch Sunset. After they eat from a bad tree, there is a bizarre eagerness, how an animal would react if they were overly-excited. They do not speak, but they grunt and cheer on a bonkers level.

This is a ninety-minute nature escape with suspense in the craziest matter and repulsive to the extreme. Its writing makes its viewers think of nature along with the creatures (who roam like animals). From this setup, I felt like there would be more surreal tones of connection and a unique-type feeling. I thought of films like Where the Wild Things Are, March of the Penguins, and Jumanji—films of creatures, animals, or humans finding a course of action in an unknown territory. There is that setup of trying to find peace for the odd sasquatch family in Sasquatch Sunset, yet its presentation is just scattered and quirky.

This habitat that is natural for the sasquatch family is not so much for the rest of its audience. The big question…where is nature going? Especially with a moment of the sasquatches coming across a boom box and going into a mental state of craziness. I was rattling my head thinking maybe it was haunted. The forms of the forest seem to be haunted by layers of normalcy…the building blocks of nature are not part of the clever process of the film’s continuity…it makes for a below average portrayal in Sasquatch Sunset. Is there a point? Is there a layer of importance I was missing? Where is the narrative or poetic vibe in this film? I had a hard time seeing it. I do credit the film for its heavy direction in unforgettable scenery though. Two out of four stars for Sasquatch Sunset.

EbertFest 2024…Star 80, Conducting Life, & The Light of Truth: Richard Hunt’s Monument to Ida B. Wells


The opening night of the 25th Annual Roger Ebert’s Film Festival began with Bob Fosse’s Star 80. In this this film, boundaries were challenged due to the behaviors in a pressure-filled relationship. Award-winning actor Eric Roberts attended the festival and engaged in a discussion after the film. Hearing Roberts talk about his days working on the film added much emphasis to the experience. The sense of realism in the diverse viewpoints about Star 80 still captivates with evolving revelations. Roberts talked about how Fosse was a director who had some strange behavior patterns himself, in part related to drug use. Roberts has continued to persevere as an actor and to this day Star 80 remains one of his most well-known films.

This film is a true story of a monumental talent. It is brilliant, spellbinding, and only half an hour long. Conducting Life follows the life story of a man who worked through his way upto make it as a conductor. That man is Roderick Cox and this movie about his passion, trials, and errors is under the direction of filmmaker Diane Moore. The exploration of talent and what it takes to truly grow as a conductor is inspirational in Conducting Life. Cox is now on the road working as a conductor in many places around the world. Seeing his story moved me and resonated with the audience. Persistence is where Conducting Life shines with an encouraging message to never give up.

Directed by Rana Segal, this is an honest, artistic documentary about the struggle for culture and rights. The story is real and is supported by layers of empathy. The Light of Truth: Richard Hunt’s Monument to Ida B. Wells paints a portrait of how racism and history have important roles to play in art. It follows an artist, Richard Hunt (who has sadly passed), who builds meaningful sculptures involving his backstory and his ethnicity. His art is also a way of showing appreciation for how times are different than the past. Hunt’s legacy involves honoring the work that African American journalist and activist Ida B. Wells did fighting for racial and gender equality. This film is an insightful portrait of courage and positive empowerment.

Treating cinema in many forms of art!