Good Luck, Have Fun, Don’t Die Review


When it comes to having concerns about how much technology is impacting our daily lives, director Gore Verbinski knows how to bring on that concept with many punches to the gut.  Good Luck, Have Fun, Don’t Die is one-of-a-kind. It’s a story where the world is seeing its end, and it all falls back onto reliance on technology, a terror that is a fear in daily life. The level of distraction is one that I am even concerned about every day when I wake up in the morning, but Good Luck, Have Fun, Don’t Die twists that and moves it forward with consequences that are well-written. With class and humor, the dangers of Good Luck, Have Fun, Don’t Die do not go unpunished.

The film begins with a dinner interrupted with a man wrapped in all kinds of foil and trash. He is The Man from The Future, played by Sam Rockwell. He goes into a diner in LA and does what he can to recruit a team to fight against AI crashing down the planet Earth. The film begins with a lot of moments where it seems like a joke, but with the right continuity it all comes together to be highly calculated and witty form of genius. What fuels this is that many of the characters have a backstory before the man’s arrival upon the diner—a comedy where peril is questioned but also provides some shocking introductions.

The events have an order, and I will elaborate on a few. My mind was floating with many words of how to describe the how much of my attention was drawn on Good Luck, Have Fun, Don’t Die. I was thoroughly invigorated while also curious as to what was creating the phenomenon to come around. Verbinski’s directing has a chronological following with Good Luck, Have Fun, Don’t Die.

The first scenario involves a man named Mark (Michael Pena) and Janet (Zazie Beetz). They are a couple working at the same school, and Mark finds himself trying to deal with students who are possessed by their phones. This leads them seeming as ifthey are becoming angry robots with resentment. Also, the main issue is that the school has many teachers on sabbaticals. Verbinski’s creation of strange dynamics has a narrative to form an uprising. After that there is a scenario where a woman named Susan (Juno Temple) loses her son and decides to go to a facility and have him cloned, however this leads her to realizing her cloned son is more like a robot. The third scenario is a woman named Ingrid (Haley Lu Richardson) who finds herself allergic to phones and Wi-fi. Most of that is because a failed relationship of hers where her partner paid more attention to video games than to her.  AI getting the attention is at the core of the clever mystery in Good Luck, Have Fun, Don’t Die. Distraction among prioritizing technology creates the build-up surrounding The Man from The Future and the people in the diner creating a vivid portrait where survival and logistics is reaching its ending point. It also leads to the characters being scared to utilize technology for help, as people’s obsession is what had led them to the end of the world scenario in the first place.

A masterful and creative flow of distractions coming back with more to throw out each time. This film does so with hard hits that make it a comedy fueled by ambition. Verbinski brings out the flaws of how people’s behaviors have karma to them. Their lives were devoted to devices with no human connection, but in the end their technology destroys them in immersive light.  The truth of the amount of destruction is like an airplane ride that is a first-class ticket to a mind-blowing location of laughs, realizations, and theories. 

One quote that speaks the most with this unexpected masterpiece goes, “I feel emotionally targeted!” That quote has a meaning resembling many of the perils that thrive in thisadventure. While some characterizations are flawed and overrated, it works for the comedy aspect and the genius continuity. Reality and AI are the obstacles and are the moving parts for a surreal adventure unlike no other–one with comedy, suspense, laughing moments, and screen-time with vengeance. Four out of for stars for Good Luck, Have Fun, Don’t Die.

 

 

“Wuthering Heights” Review


When there is a film directed by Emerald Fennell, there is a guaranteed dynamic which is bound to have intriguing shifts. This is certainly the case in her newest film “Wuthering Heights,” based on the novel written by Emily Bronte. This time around, Fennell utilizes her vision as a director on a romantic journey that is mind-blowing with a combination of tragedy and love. The 1800s setting in Yorkshire, England emphasizes the uniqueness of the era and differences between the higher-class and lower-class. Love is ultimately what stands in the middle of “Wuthering Heights.”

The two main characters are Cathy and Heathcliff (Margot Robbie and Jacob Elordi). They have grown up together and are in love. Like the terrain in Yorkshire, the relationship tends to go up and down. Much is connected to their upbringing which stands between the connection Cathy and Heathcliff have. With Cathy navigating her own lifestyle, and Heathcliff struggling, there is a point of separation. When that occurs, there is a chance to restore what once existed, but the obstacles are risky along with destructive.

The film is compelling because of the way it is set up between the characters. Cathy is presented with the opportunity which would lead to a wealthier life where she could thrive. Heathcliff has many more hardships, so Cathy finds herself in a difficult place. She decides to marry Edgar (Shazad Latif) because she sees some future with him. However, the presence of Heathcliff pulls at her heart strings. “Wuthering Heights” creates a spellbinding drama that warms hearts with love.

Throughout the various hurdles faced by the lead characters, “Wuthering Heights” stays cinematic by keeping the relationship issues between Cathy and Heathcliff upfront. Robbie and Elordi are sensational. They make “Wuthering Heights”a dramatic ride filled with lust, power, and mixed emotions. Their performances are like a period-piece with intense dramatics and deep context. The overarching theme of soul-searching is used by Fennell to challenge audiences in “Wuthering Heights.”

Throughout my viewing experience, I found this film to be poetic. The fact that there are moments where things do not work out but still love exists was heartwarming. Through the eyes of Robbie and Elordi, the power of remaining connected is well within reach in “Wuthering Heights.” Love is lost and found in a compelling way. There is just no easy way to define why choices are made. Yet, the point of self-sacrifice is gut-wrenching in “Wuthering Heights.”

I was astonished. I was mesmerized. I was in profound thought. The realization of how much human connection can mean hit me deeply during “Wuthering Heights.” The theme of a forever-relationship taking place in the late 1800s spoke to me, especially in an era in which there were no technological advancements. Instead, only-face-to-face interactions which resulted in immersive moments of love. Fennell brings audiences on a journey that is one-of-a-kind. Not everyone may understand it at first, but the dramatics are a wild adventure that is all about love and how much it can hurt. Three-and-a-half out of four stars for “Wuthering Heights.”

Dracula Review


I experienced boredom despite several interesting moments. My eyes were dry, my thoughts were wandering, and this movie kept failing to captivate me. Written and directed by Luc Besson, this is Dracula, a film where revival is such a strong focus. The layout felt promising, but then sadly relied too much on terror to suffice for the rest of the film. Dracula is a dry adventure that left me feeling blurred because of the way science and reality were co-mingled in the picture. Overall, I just was not sold.

The setting is 15th century Romania. The main character is Prince Vladimir/Dracula, played by Caleb Landry Jones, who is a king of power with lust for his young wife. He also fights for his glory with the swordsmanship, so much so that his characterization appears unstoppable. But then a tragedy takes his wife, Princess Elisabeta/Mina, away from him. She is played by Zoe Bleu. It all comes down to believing in God, and that is where Priest comes in. Priest is played by Christoph Waltz. Mina is his experiment. The study of vampires goes way back, but then Vladimir/Dracula comes back from the dead to redeem what is lost. In the end, the power of faith combats everything.

The film just felt like it was pushing too many boundaries. The context was out of place. However, I give much credit to the performance of Waltz. His character is detail-oriented with keenknowledge which allows him to take many risks in the face of uncertainty. When it comes to vampires, the battle just does not work. Dracula relies upon its historical context to explore evil, greed, and lust, but the execution is severely lacking and fails to make the current film exhilarating. 

I went to the movie anticipating much excitement due to the exorcism, but overall, it just never delivered. The crumbling of a dynasty seems to have become the sole focus. So much of the action surrounding the characterizations of Prince Vladimir/Dracula and Elisabeta/Mina just never really clicked. With Elizabeta/Mina being studied by the Priest, that storylinesimply did not add much value. Again, there appeared to be a strong start, but then transitioned to evil spirits lingering which went off in directions that did not speak to me at all. This is one of Besson’s most lacking projects which is unfortunate.

With all the theories and the fantasy vibes, this film is a beauty of a mess. Dracula is presented like the writing was still going on during the process of making the movie. I felt like there werepage-breaks between the scenes. Some were monstrous and medieval, and then scientific later. Then there would inexplicably be a hypothesis or a blank slate.

Despite my frustration, Dracula may have value for some fans, especially those who go deep into backstories of monsters during this era. Overall, the story appears to be presented to make those who believe in hierarchy worship evil. It could havebeen done so much better, instead of being rushed. Two out of four stars for Dracula.

 

Treating cinema in many forms of art!