Tag Archives: A24

The Death of Robin Hood


Technologically brilliant is how I define The Death of Robin Hood. The rest of the film is hampered by a blurred storyline dominated by vengeance beneath the surface. The continuity of the film felt flat in spite of the grandeur of cinematography in a setting centuries ago. The acting is stunning, but I had issues with the pacing. Written and directed by Michael Sarnoski, this film is about a battle of grief past and present seen through the eyes of Robin (Hugh Jackman).

The plot involves Robin dealing with his dark history of murder and crime. He seeks redemption. However, at the same time he cannot put his past behind him. Jackman displays seriousness well in The Death of Robin Hood as he finds himself reeling from an injury. With the help of a lady named Sister Brigid (Jodie Comer), he sees some light ahead. Also, with a man named Edward (Bill Skarsgard), there is a theme of teamwork and redemption, yet the storytelling is confusing.

Jackman’s performance delivers a haunting message that his character is not to be messed with. Moments from his present and past spiral in ways that feel unpredictable. I struggled with what the director chose to emphasize in the film primarily because the backstory felt drawn out. Overall, it was very subtle and quiet. Unfortunately, the establishment of an understandable landscape was not truly there. I just felt there could have been more context established to explain why Robin Hood is facing so many perils. The film relies too much on technology and darkness for its selling points.

Sarnoski incorporates some effective storytelling, but it felt removed from the central conflict. He relies on cinematography and Jackman’s performance to create suspense. These scenes take on more importance than the dynamics between the characters played by Comer and Skarsgard. I felt they deserved more. I  felt the film kept spiraling around an angry man looking back at his past with moments of brutal violence. In the end, the revolution fails to be supported by a compelling narrative. The movie starts off OK, but then slides down to flatness leading to a steady slew of disappointment.

Overall, there are some meaningful moments showing how grief and revenge take their toll. Sarnoski knows how to portray humanistic values. Still, the film failed to satisfy me. The historical components do not have the wonders I anticipated. Therefore, I only give it two out of four stars.

Backrooms Review


This is one of those films where I felt my mind going from a mild headache to being incredibly disgusted and disturbed. The question in my head was how messed up is Backrooms? Honestly, pretty messed up, with walls that continue to fade along with puppets thrown in to feel like A Blair Witch Projectblur. The camera does not hold steady as it portrays everything through a rocky motion. A promising premise that is ruined by the horrid tones. I was not pleased with Backrooms. This is hard for me to say, but I truly was not sold at all.

The plot revolves around a therapist and a patient. The “therapist” is Mary, played by Renate Reinsve, and the “patient” is Clark, played by Chiwetel Ejiofor. Clark’s stressor is the fact that his furniture shop is in hysterics with debts and strange technical maladies. A lot of it continues with lights dimming on and off and his financial crisis being quite bad, so he finds himself sleeping in the business’s building. However, there is a haunting that aspect that lingers in Backrooms. The walls have hidden aisles that are unexplained. With the beginning of the film feeling like The Blair Witch Project, it has that haunting approach. The execution though, fails in its overlap of events—primarily because the introductions make no sense.

Clark finds himself repeatedly walking through the hurdles of his walls. He thinks he is hallucinating. Mary believes that Clark is just emotionally depressed because of his stressful  situation. Everything from then on continues to fall downhill. The key to the haunting aspects of Clark’s business has weird elements written all over it.  It is portrayed through a shaky camera, a maze of walls, and questionable mental health written into the center of it all. The film made me feel like it was a psychological headache.

There is a moment where Clark is trying to find the many walls of his own nightmare. He does this by walking through the walls of his store. He is attempting to find the key that can solve his problems. In reality, he is living in his own worst nightmare. I felt a bit like his adventure was my own worst nightmare as I continued to watch. The true terrors are not defined well at all and lack purpose in Backrooms.

The focus is one that shifts so much. It tries to keep feeling creative and bizarre and I can appreciate that approach, but it is like it was all thrown into a pool and just placed in no real order. That is the problem with Backrooms, the terror is not solidified because its foundation is weak. Promising terrors, but not providing the delivery they deserve. Who is the one in the most danger? Is it Mary or Clark? Is Clark truly insane? He might be, however the approaches to terror and anxiety fall flat. There are shocking moments that have revolutionary feelings, however the contexts in which they are presented are mediocre. Backrooms isa maze that looks  confusing rather than being entertaining. I was more sold on the wonderful performance of Reinsve than the film itself. The acting is here is quite good, but the rest is a mess. I truly had a  hard time defining my experience with this one. Two out of four stars.

 

Mother Mary Review


This film is like a fantasy where the lines between talent and reality are blurred. The artistic side seems universally magnificent. However, the pacing and characterizations are out of tune. Directed by David Lowery, he creates places of power and love and adds layers of a Kingsman era. Only Mother Mary is strictly female. There are moments of openness which express artistic talent, yet the meaning behind it is tainted. The film combines a mixture of various moments in which nothing gets accomplished. Cinematically wonderful, but the writing side…a flop!

The main characters are Mother Mary (Anne Hathaway) and Sam Anselm (Michaela Coel). The film follows suffering iconic pop star, Mother Mary. She finds herself getting together with her costume designer Sam. Mother Mary is on the verge of regaining her fame by performing. Her costumes and her appearance have elements that she questions. The film becomes an odd and bizarre journey of self-discovery. Unfortunately, I found continuity and creativity lacking.

The film has some imaginative dynamics. In Hathaway’s performance, she portrays a character who is pursuing her destiny by pushing above and beyond. In Coel’s performance, she demonstrates a persistent desire to compete. At the same time, they are both females with interesting creative narratives, and they adequately fit their roles. The dynamics of the film have potential which are not fully harnessed. Specifically, the cinematography and choreography are impressive in parts. The rest of the film…trash! It starts by using wonderful elements and then throws them down the drain.

I am trying to be positive about this film, but it is not easy. I thought the pop and dance stuff would lead to a Black Swan or Moulin Rouge type of experience, but it didn’t. What I got was a film where imagination and a comeback fail to see eye-to-eye. Hathaway’s performance of struggle speaks, but the rest of the film fails to comply. Mother Mary is a pop concert filled with confusion, silliness, and wasted creativity which never delivers. The film does have some scenes with very cool red lighting. In the end, they’re also a waste since this rest is so lacking.

Mother Mary should have built on the cinematography. But the artistry in the characterizations is some of the worst I have seen. I came prepared to appreciate the performances. It is a pity that they fall apart. Two out of four stars for Mother Mary.