Thunderbolts* Review


In this film I saw a chance for a new story to emerge and continue to build purpose. Thunderbolts* has an approach that fuels the Marvel Cinematic Universe. A sense of restoration lies ahead. Directed by Jake Schreier, the film is written by Eric Pearson and Joanna Calo. The many filmmakers behind Thunderbolts* loops in enticement that creates an immersive moviegoing experience.  Thunderbolts* may seem whacky at times, but the characterizations build upon each other as a new team arises.

The film begins with a group of antiheroes. They are Yelena Belova (Florence Pugh), Robert Reynolds/Sentry (Lewis Pullman), Bucky Barnes (Sebastian Stan), John Walker/U.S. Agent (Wyatt Russell), Alexei Shostakov/Red Guardian (David Harbour), and Ava Starr/Ghost (Hannah John-Kamen). They all come to the realization that they are the targets of a trap. This leads them into a mission that will bring up a bad and rude awakening. With one questioning lead, there might be more for these heroes than they anticipated. Valentina Allegra de Fontaine (Julie Louis-Dreyfus) appears to be the enemy of what is at stake and one to watch out for.

For this new feature, I felt the dynamics come together to realize there is a greater good. A lot of the quirkiness is between the performances of Pugh, Harbour, and Russell—they all have that spark that gains momentum from each other’s senses of humor. There is a foundation combining power to build resilience for the moments ahead. Thunderbolts* is not spectacular, but the layout of who to root for plays a vital role in the film’s continuity, and it is unstoppable.

Overall, there is a sense of curiosity. The film begs the question of why these heroes are the ones that are the targets? Why are they the focus? The proper answer to these two questions is because they all still have uncharted territory to learn. Much of that comes from the politics that interweave throughout the filmand this is where the enemy Valentina comes up as the red flag.

It is not exactly filled with action and explosions, but it evokes a value of laughter in its nature. This is of course in the good sense. Thunderbolts* is a title that is a springboard for new adventures to be movie-bound later down the line. Sparks for attention and excitement spiral the film’s humor. The butting heads of the heroes are just the beginning. Thunderbolts* is a landscape for powers to keep growing and have an exploration that develops immersive components.

Deep down, much of this film finds its brilliance in being written with the trust of no one single direction.   Audiences can sense a portrait of frustration or annoyance within the heroes. That alone, is the sign that some may be on the side its audience is hoping for, and some may not. Altogether there is a resolution of expectations that throttles the fun of Thunderbolts*. A Marvel film almost making it to the brilliance spectacle, but not quite there. An excellent start to building more character development. Three out of four stars.

Bonjour Tristesse Review


The dynamic force of nature is one of fire in Bonjour Tristesse where characterizations and risks burn through the screen rapidly. Directed by Durga Chew-Bose, her focus is one that blends challenges among individuals to a cinematically grueling extent. With Lily McInerny and Chloe Sevigny, both are actresses that develop a personality not to be messed with. McInerny takes on roles that challenge innocence and vulnerability. Bonjour Tristesse is a step-up for her after her performance in Palm Trees and Power Lines which was a hard-watch, but she endured a hard topic through humanistic approaches. McInerny is a woman of diverse behaviors as a growing star.

The setting is along a French seaside. The characters are Cecile (McInerny), her father Raymond (Claes Bang), and Raymond’s partner Elsa (Nailia Harzoune). Cecile also has boyfriend, Cyril (Aliocha Schneider). Cecile is an introverted girl who has close bonds with her father, her boyfriend, and Elsa. They spend their days in paradise enjoying the sunsets and having their social moments. The film’s scenery is vibrant with many wonderous colors. It weaves a notion that there is a form of positivity and lively connection —thanks to the many hours and days of sunlight and beautiful weather.

The joyful days hit a pause when an old friend comes for a visit. Her name is Anne (Sevigny) and she friend of Cecile’s late mother. When she arrives it becomes a ride where there is discreet frustration that lingers on in patterns.  Anne has her moments of being judgmental and envious—she pushes Cecile’s buttons. Anne is a vocalist and has no filter on her view of people. Sevigny’s performance is one of sinister and opinionated tones. This begins to make Cecile build a quiet rage in her head. Bonjour Tristesse presents a form of tolerance forced to be reckoned with.

With the happy moments not always feeling the way they should, the representation of Cecile’s thought process makes her the center of the film. How does she feel about Anne? Why is Anne critical? What does Cecile want? What does Anne want? What I adore about the film’s focus is how the pacing raises in dramatics as the story moves forward.

The layout of routine encountering interruption presents that authenticity of one feeling as if their wishes are not being acknowledged. This is the case with both Cecile and Anne, as the film’s conflict follows back to them. The nosiness of Anne and the sensitivity of Cecile is a layer of human nature that creates enrichment in how they respond to situations of not feeling comfortable. 

Bonjour Tristesse is relentlessly brilliant. The stalker personality in the performance of Sevigny along with the innocence (in McInerny’s performance) is of rapid fire. The writing is well-scripted to present that acceptance of a challenge that just further stirs the pot. Of all those involved, the ball is in Cecile’s courtand her aggravations are justified. Bonjour Tristesse creates a world of forbearance through undeveloped eyes. A tale of egos that thrive for attention—the ones in that boat are Cecile, Elsa, and Anne. Anne though, is the wheel of encouraging disconnect.

I appreciate the chemistry of “disconnect” in Bonjour Tristesse. That is because the sense of free expression is a surreal element of beauty. The humanistic denotations here are mounted intuitively. With looking back at McInerny’s performance, she has the personality and power to play roles that are in situations that do not seem right. However, she is also one that displays innocence where her thoughts matter. Every conflict, moment, and dynamic switch has honesty in Bonjour Tristesse. It is an arthouse of colors that weaves artistry and behaviors that continue to overlap one another and at the same time gives the presence of curiosity fully present in human aspects. Four out of four stars.

Color Book (Ebertfest 2025)


Directed by David Fortune, this is a realistic journey about impactful changes that lead to fulfillment. The film’s cinematography is black and white and presents a story that is mind-boggling and mentally enticing. It is also emotional weaving in high and low moments. What hit me close to home in Color Book was the relationship between a father and his son who has Downs Syndrome. The story explores how parenting requires patience and unconditional love despite challenges. In this story, the challenges are greater because the father is raising his son alone.

Color Book’s screenplay is heartfelt and one-of-a-kind. The setting is Atlanta, Georgia. The father is Lucky (played by Wiliam Catlett), and his son is Mason (played by Jeremiah Alexander Daniels). Mason struggles with sensory overload. After the passing of his Mason’s mother, Lucky must help Mason find coping skills and raise him to have a fulfilling life. Mason has a fascination with having a balloon by his side which is the personification of calm. Mason also enjoys coloring which is linked to the film’s title. Lucky strives to make Mason happy, but it is mentally difficult for both father and son. 

The film’s mission is to find the connection between Lucky and Mason. Lucky promises to take Mason on a trip to a baseball game. This adventure has hurdles along the way as they encounter blockades of frustration. Deep down, however, there is love extending from Lucky to his son, Mason. At certain moments in the film, it may not be presented as love, but the new challenges serve as meaningful signs to the film’s audience. Color Book is a breathtaking portrait of acceptance and encouragement which are essential to the bond between Lucky and Mason.

Color Book felt soothing to me as Lucky and Mason learned to adapt. While there are struggles, happiness abounds. Despite the differences between father and son, Color Book highlights the beauty of acceptance as a form of love. Color Book creates a pattern of how a heart can love unconditionally. 

Seeing this masterpiece at Ebertfest reminded me how movies can spark emotions. I felt many different feelings during the turmoil throughout the film. I also felt the engagement of the audience around me. Color Book filled me with empathy due to the high-quality cinematic narrative. The film is not only deep, but visually stunning. Color Book reminds its audience to think about how others may see the world. People like Mason or his father Lucky who view the world from their own unique perspectives. The story also demonstrates how different behaviors lead to different outcomes. For example, Mason frequently has conflicts based on his sensory complications, and Lucky struggles to adapt. Deep down, human values so beautifully woven into the film’s story kept me intrigued. I thought about all the love that was present, but also what new elements both individuals had to adapt to while tolerating each other. This movie is an unforgettable portrait of love and parenting that is filled with artistic value. Three-and-a-half out of four stars for Color Book.

Treating cinema in many forms of art!