Tag Archives: Greenwich

Bonjour Tristesse Review


The dynamic force of nature is one of fire in Bonjour Tristesse where characterizations and risks burn through the screen rapidly. Directed by Durga Chew-Bose, her focus is one that blends challenges among individuals to a cinematically grueling extent. With Lily McInerny and Chloe Sevigny, both are actresses that develop a personality not to be messed with. McInerny takes on roles that challenge innocence and vulnerability. Bonjour Tristesse is a step-up for her after her performance in Palm Trees and Power Lines which was a hard-watch, but she endured a hard topic through humanistic approaches. McInerny is a woman of diverse behaviors as a growing star.

The setting is along a French seaside. The characters are Cecile (McInerny), her father Raymond (Claes Bang), and Raymond’s partner Elsa (Nailia Harzoune). Cecile also has boyfriend, Cyril (Aliocha Schneider). Cecile is an introverted girl who has close bonds with her father, her boyfriend, and Elsa. They spend their days in paradise enjoying the sunsets and having their social moments. The film’s scenery is vibrant with many wonderous colors. It weaves a notion that there is a form of positivity and lively connection —thanks to the many hours and days of sunlight and beautiful weather.

The joyful days hit a pause when an old friend comes for a visit. Her name is Anne (Sevigny) and she friend of Cecile’s late mother. When she arrives it becomes a ride where there is discreet frustration that lingers on in patterns.  Anne has her moments of being judgmental and envious—she pushes Cecile’s buttons. Anne is a vocalist and has no filter on her view of people. Sevigny’s performance is one of sinister and opinionated tones. This begins to make Cecile build a quiet rage in her head. Bonjour Tristesse presents a form of tolerance forced to be reckoned with.

With the happy moments not always feeling the way they should, the representation of Cecile’s thought process makes her the center of the film. How does she feel about Anne? Why is Anne critical? What does Cecile want? What does Anne want? What I adore about the film’s focus is how the pacing raises in dramatics as the story moves forward.

The layout of routine encountering interruption presents that authenticity of one feeling as if their wishes are not being acknowledged. This is the case with both Cecile and Anne, as the film’s conflict follows back to them. The nosiness of Anne and the sensitivity of Cecile is a layer of human nature that creates enrichment in how they respond to situations of not feeling comfortable. 

Bonjour Tristesse is relentlessly brilliant. The stalker personality in the performance of Sevigny along with the innocence (in McInerny’s performance) is of rapid fire. The writing is well-scripted to present that acceptance of a challenge that just further stirs the pot. Of all those involved, the ball is in Cecile’s courtand her aggravations are justified. Bonjour Tristesse creates a world of forbearance through undeveloped eyes. A tale of egos that thrive for attention—the ones in that boat are Cecile, Elsa, and Anne. Anne though, is the wheel of encouraging disconnect.

I appreciate the chemistry of “disconnect” in Bonjour Tristesse. That is because the sense of free expression is a surreal element of beauty. The humanistic denotations here are mounted intuitively. With looking back at McInerny’s performance, she has the personality and power to play roles that are in situations that do not seem right. However, she is also one that displays innocence where her thoughts matter. Every conflict, moment, and dynamic switch has honesty in Bonjour Tristesse. It is an arthouse of colors that weaves artistry and behaviors that continue to overlap one another and at the same time gives the presence of curiosity fully present in human aspects. Four out of four stars.

Ex-Husbands Review


The title sets a melancholy tone that has a dramatic presence. The direction is subtle in this film and there is a sense that there is a mid-life crisis scenario at hand. Ex-Husbands speaks for itself. The writing and directing is by Noah Pritzker who is just entering the game of directing full-length features. In Ex-Husbands, he pushes the limits of happiness encountering blockades. 

The film focuses on Peter Pearce (played by Griffin Dunne), a middle-aged man going through a divorce with his wife Maria Pearce (played by Rosanna Arquette). His father Simon Pearce (played by Richard Benjamin) is very sick in a nursing home. The oldest son Nick Pearce (played by James Norton) is engaged but his relationship is also in a bad place. The youngest son Mickey Pearce is gay and struggles with moments of feeling closeted in his self-love journey. To escape the many dramas, Peter books a trip to Tulum. Coincidentally, Nick’s bachelor party is in the same location. Peter has traveled to Tulum by himself, and Nick and Mickey are there to celebrate Nick’s engagement. With many moving parts that are mentally hard to take, Ex-Husbands becomes a place where reconciliation has a chance to overcome dramatic undertones. 

When the film takes its audience to Tulum, the portrait painted is of happiness being harder than expected to achieve. With all the personal problems between Peter and his boys, the film’s pacing made me feel different given the various fragments in which some moments are upbeat and then others down. The real feelings are bound to take audiences on a ride of underlying sadness. Peter is not sure how to handle his mentally aggravating scenarios, and neither are his boys.

While Ex-Husbands creates thoughts of resentment, the characters slowly find common ground. This happens when Nick invites his father to some bachelor party festivities. They start to bond over sharing rough patches. There are unlikely connections at unexpected moments between Peter, Nick and Mickey. Nick’s problems correlate to the ones that he shares with his father despite being engaged. Their personality traits lead to dynamics that are spot on in Ex-Husbands.

Another instance where there is an unlikely connection at an unexpected moment happens when there is a sense that the bachelor party may not feel all that special. However, at the same time, it is a chance for Peter to be there for his son even though it was not his intention to end up at the same vacation spot. The precious timing in Ex-Husband takes a serious turn and demonstrates to the audience that Peter’s life is not in the happiest place, nor is life for his boys either. The younger son feels stuck in the middle of it all. He is the third wheel trying to battle his own thoughts of feeling closeted and lost. 

The emotions displayed in Heizer’s performance made me think of his role from the Netflix series 13 Reasons Why. He still has the ability to play an ailing young man in Ex-Husbands.Norton’s performance reminded me of his role from the film Nowhere Special. When he is trying to have a good time before problems begin, he is in that same emotional state in Ex-Husbands. Even though the men’s problems are depressing, the question of whose problems are more important is really no competition. The reality is that sticking together gives a family purpose.

The family navigating the difficulties around them is where Ex-Husbands finds its essential track. It is not a feel-good flick but instead defines what is essential when there is family turmoil. Finding solutions is portrayed poetically in Ex-Husbands. It gives a realistic view with artistic perspective of life scenarios that can be hard to tango with. Three out of four stars.

Sorry/Not Sorry Review


A documentary that sheds a dangerously truthful light on a comedic icon, Sorry/Not Sorry follows a trail of fame, patterns, and defamation. The #Metoo movement goes to the depths of honesty in a haunting matter in this film. Its focus is comedian Louis C.K. and the allegations against him regarding sexual misconduct. The title speaks for itself. I have seen Louis perform live three times in 2015, 2016, and 2021 (after his allegations and post-covid). Each of those times always left me with a different feeling of laughter. Sorry/Not Sorry linked me back to many of the times where I had once adored the works of C.K. and brought on some reflection.

Sorry/Not Sorry is a detailed documentary including many interviews with comedians and critics on the allegations against Louis C.K. The trend of what is hard to accept with Sorry/Not Sorry is that the weird events of Louis did in fact happen. The film jumps back to his comedy moments of him telling many of his jokes. The depiction captures him being very open and detailed about contentious stuff in his material. It then dives into events and scenarios leading up to the controversy around Louis.

It is all hard to watch. Normally with Louis, I would be used to laughing until my lungs hurt, yet Sorry/Not Sorry is not in that zone. These are true events not jokes.  The interview with Jen Kirkman is what haunted me the most, as she explains her early days as a comic and how she worked with Louis. The documentary presents a challenge in its storyline of the events of Louis C.K.  Its presentation seems to be one of disgust at how quickly tings can be forgotten when fame and money are involved.

The aspect of his material is a two-way street in Sorry/Not Sorry. Why would Louis go into detail about sexual topics within his acts after everything he went through? How does the funny feel good with the presence of the shocking realism of the surrounding topics? All are too graphic to go into detail, but the world knows his actions. The hatred vibes swirl here. Sorry/Not Sorry is a heartless documentary that throws buckets of despise to the max. 

The interviews though, do shine a light on the talent Louis had. That is his observations of messed up moments and life scenarios. The truth of which guts the audience. It is the fact that he admitted to the allegations against him. The film does dive into fame and brilliance, and then dives into questions. How did Louis get away with his actions? How was he able to rise backto fame? Sorry/Not Sorry is a dark documentary of admittance, failure and a questionable comeback.

This is not a film that is easy to take in. It is difficult to absorbas its delivery is filled with a lot of heavy material from victims and those who basically dismiss the accusations. I found the documentary to have patterns of anger and frustration going in a spiral. Sorry/Not Sorry is a title of admittance, but there is context that dives deeper than audiences realize. It keeps its calm approach to feel light-hearted. The film itself still aches from the harsh reality of truth with too much binding of emotions in a form that continues to be unnerving. Two out of four stars for Sorry/Not Sorry.