
Bong Joon Ho has navigated territories that are hard to overcome as a filmmaker. He is from South Korea and has directed films that have blown audiences out of the water, especially with Parasite winning many awards in 2020. It was one of the first international films to win Best Picture at the Academy Awards that year. From that aspect, the success of his work is how he ties themes together to create a purpose. Mickey 17 has that direction and approaches being monumental. The surfaces though, have tangents. It is a film based on the novel Mickey 7, written by Edward Ashton. Ho wrote the screenplay of this film and for those who know the foundations of his previous films, they will see the fantasy world through his eyes with Mickey 17.
Ho’s directing trait is that of having diversity among genres. Mickey 17 blends that aspect with the use of space and fantasy settings mixed with dark comedy layers. The film’s main character is Mickey Barnes, played by Robert Pattinson. The year is 2054 on an isolated planet orbiting in space. Pattinson’s voice is the narration of Mickey 17. It feels two-sided because his character is in the pattern of living and dying multiple times. Going forward, Mickey is used as a tool for high-risk endeavorswhere his many odd deaths come into play, simply because he is reusable. Under a strange and egotistical commander named Kenneth Marshall (played by Mark Ruffalo) and his wife Yifa(played by Toni Collette), Mickey must try to reassess his memories before his usage is thrown in the wrong direction, as itfrequently is. With the help of a friend, Timo (played by Steven Yeun), Mickey has does have some hope of accomplishing this. The mission though, is one that is bound to have many repeats.
The direction of Ho is bound to find its humorous aspect the purest form in Mickey 17. It is not as mesmerizing, but it is a film that feels like a video game or a sitcom on acid. This is especially true in modes where Pattinson is repeatedly talking to another version of himself, as it makes audiences curious as to which version is the brighter one. The various levels of seeming “brighter” go down a rabbit hole of catastrophic adventures with the planet and the orbit being at risk. Pattinson’s voice fuels the film with the narration providing continuous dialogue. For Ho, it is clear that he wants the full-on characterization on Pattinson. The shifting of gears with conflicts and the world around Mickey 17 is a foundation that is complex and not always easy to follow. However, it is still a stellar film with great entertainmentvalue based upon its moving parts and qualities that endure throughout.
With Ruffalo and Collette in the roles of superiors, and Pattinson as the protagonist, it is a world that navigates its tracks by hovering over the surface. Their performances are not serious, but they build a well-crafted foundation for expectancy of a joyful ride off course. Ho is known to create disasters for cinematic effect, but I felt this time he did not accomplish much of that on the levels of his previous films. Still, Mickey 17 is well done and rapidly paced. Pattinson as one who is repeatedly disposed of and revived is where the volume of humor and contempt hit the fan here. Mickey 17 is a universal voyage with many joyful turns that are unforgettable. Three out of four stars for Mickey 17.



