I have always been a fan of The Coen Brothers and their films. Lately, they have done more dramas and serious films. However, “Hail, Caesar” is a film quite satirical. The Coen Brothers bring us a film that has a “Fargo” (1996) feel with and a little bit of “O Brother Where Art Thou” (2000). However, it does not rely on violence and it contains very less profound language. Surprisingly, the funny works without the language.

The film follows a Hollywood fixer in the 1950s, Eddie Mannix (Josh Brolin). Mannix is doing all he can to keep his studio in line running. He is someone that stresses out about a lot of elements of his Hollywood job. He has numerous movie stars. There is Baird Whitlock (George Clooney), Hobey Dole (Alden Ehrenreich), DeeAnna Moran (Scarlett Johansson), and Burt Gurney (Channing Tatum). Each of them is involved with different productions, however the top-notch actor is Whitlock. Whitlock is the center of attention for most of the film.

Whitlock is kidnapped and that causes Mannix’s studio to go down the hill with a variety of conflicts. This includes a crazy journalist wanting the truth of Whitlock’s disappearance, disorganizations with production of Whitlock’s biggest movie, and the studio having financial issues. Viewers may think a kidnapping is the main problem based off the commercials, but that is not one, there is more to the kidnapping then viewers think.

“Hail, Caesar” is carefully paced. What is good about it’s pacing is it does not rely on dialogue trying hard to be what is funny. The plot points and the ridiculous scenarios that come unexpectedly is what can be entertaining. One moment, a man is kidnapped, another an issue with the studio goes insane, there is not knowing a definite answer of the hysterical conflicts among the actors.

The technical aspect of this movie that is vast is the cinematography; the cinematographer was done by Roger Deakins who did the cinematography for The Coen Brothers western “True Grit” (2010). The projection was shot in 35-millimeter projection, and that is how most films set in the 1950s feel realistic. I have watched a variety of films in 35-millimeter over the years, but “Hail, Caesar” made me feel like I was a local watching a classic with everyone in old-fashioned print on the big screen. It is a fun time at the movies with The Coen Brothers.

With the Oscars approaching, I watched a movie that was intriguing, intense, and haunting. That movie is “Room.” Directed by Lenny Abrahamson, this film is destined to be a faithful movie for its viewers. It stars Brie Larson (as Ma), Jacob Tremblay (as Jack), Sean Bridgers (as Old Nick), Joan Allen (as Nancy), and William H. Macy (as Robert). “Room” is nominated for best actress, best director, best-adapted screenplay, and best picture. I see “Room” to having a chance of winning for best director and best-adapted screenplay because both of those elements are why the film is enticing.

“Room” is about a Ma and her little boy Jack. For many years they have been confined in a space that is very small shed. That is where Jack has lived his whole life. His mom does everything she can to ensure his safety. However, the hard part for Jack is that he has never seen the real world. Therefore, he wonders everyday what it will be like. However, after an escape, Jack and his Ma are finally out in the real world. The hard thing for Jack is that he has not seen so much, but now he is getting use to the world he has in the many years of his life ahead of him.

Later on in the film, we are introduced to the parents Nancy and Robert. They do their best to try and help out Ma and Jack into feeling safe and from the press. They have quite a hard story and past behind them, which leaves for unsettling news. Also, Ma is not so sure that she is in the right place for her boy either. Jack has rarely socialized, has not received much education, attention, and still is confused of how the world works. He had no idea how many humans there even are on the planet.

“Room” is a movie that I found enthralling by its directing. My other favorite Abrahamson film is “Frank” (2014): a movie with a similar concept but more lighthearted and funny. He completely transitions directing. From a dark comedy (with “Frank”) to a serious movie (“Room”).

I believe “Room” is worthy of many awards. I found myself crying at certain moments of the movie. With honesty, no one can take away the performance that Brie Larson put on. “Room” is a film that is like a journey. A journey that is very unexpected until one reaches the climax.

Four stars.

Many may wonder why Leonardo DiCaprio has not won an Oscar. He has been nominated for numerous acting awards and has not one once. “The Revenant” better be one where he wins though. “The Revenant” is a film that is visually stunning with scenery, action, and close-up shots that make viewers feel they are part of the movie. Alejandro G. Inarritu has outdone himself with “The Revenant.” I thought at first that “Birdman” was his best, but “The Revenant” takes his directing to a whole new level.

Most of the movie is predictable, however, predictable in a context where the predictability establishes a good, suspense plot for its viewers. DiCaprio is Hugh Glass, a huntsman who is left for a bear mauling. Then there is F. Scott Fitzgerald (played by Tom Hardy), the outspoken, arrogant, and aggravating hunter along with Glass. Fitzgerald is the one that leaves Glass to be attacked by the bear, betrays his paths, and takes it out on killing Glass’s son. This leaves Glass to go on a ravaging journey for revenge against Fitzgerald.

What made the movie suspenseful was its use of scenery. I saw this at an advanced screening and Will Poulter (who has a role in the movie) was there. He mentioned that all the lighting in “The Revenant” was filmed with natural lighting. That natural lighting is used so perfectly where audience feel as if they are being embraced in the wilderness of British Columbia. The natural lighting and the wild animals all play for an experience that is very enticing. Inarritu’s use of cinematography reminded me of the director David Fincher. I say this because the outdoor cinematography of “The Revenant” looked similar to Fincher’s “The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo” (2011). The cinematography of outdoors in that movie was on an island in Sweden. I can tell readers now that with “The Revenant,” there are in for a treat with scenery and excitement.

For DiCaprio, he does quite well with all of the hard elements he had to go through with making “The Revenant.” This includes him getting hypothermia, and sleeping in animal carcasses. That is disgusting with complete honesty. I find that the scenes where animal carcasses are involved plays into the brilliant style of directing of Inarritu. The scenes may be disgusting and hard to watch. However, it is another element of making viewers feel they are more in the movie.

I know DiCaprio went through other hard elements with making a variety of his movies. However, that is off topic, and I want to get into a good conclusion of why “The Revenant” is so stunning as a movie and a work-of-art sensation.

Throughout the beginning, middle, and end, there are frequent moments of close-ups of old-fashioned weaponry. Weaponry, which involves bow, arrows, spears, axes, and guns that can only shoot well with gunpowder. The lack of resources makes viewers curious of how the characters can or will survive if they get hurt. That is because there is not much to treat the injured in this time frame. It is a film where we wonder how injuries can go given the lack of first-aid.

Overall, “The Revenant” is by far one of the best movies of 2015. I believe I will watch this movie a second time when it gets its nationwide release on January 5^th. I do not think it is necessarily better than “Birdman” but it is something different among different filming elements. An intense, moving, and a truthful movie that is faithful to its time period.

Four stars.