Boyhood – Film Review by Roberto Espinosa


Written and Directed by Roberto Espinosa

Starring: Patricia Arquette, Ellar Coltrane, Lorelei Linklater, Ethan Hawke

Running Time: 165 minutes

 

 

A boy looks up at a perfect blue sky as he waits for his mother to pick him up. The soundtrack blasts Coldplay’s “Yellow” and the opening lyrics perfectly match the mood of the film we are about to sit through. In Richard Linklater’s new film “Boyhood”, we follow our main protagonist, Mason Evans, played beautifully by Ellar Coltrane, age from an innocent five year old to that of a rebellious eighteen year old, all throughout the time span of 165 minutes.

Mason starts out as a daydreamer, always being told by teachers to pay attention and to turn in his homework despite having done it. He also overhears his mom, played by Patricia Arquette in a very notable performance, argue with her failed relationships who always seem to be alcoholics. Yeah, this movie is not very alcohol friendly, sometimes in a very “after-school special” way but I’ll get to that in a bit. 

But it’s not just Mason. Everyone else in this film ages as well as progresses as the film goes on. We have his incompetent older sister Samantha, played by Linklater’s real life daughter Lorelei Linklater, his mom who just can’t seem to get a break, not just with her love life, but her life in general due to having kids, her job, having to move multiple times each time a failed relationship happens or she finds another job that pays well, and her relationship with her ex-husband, played by Ethan Hawke. When he visits the kids, he has this lovable energy that really wants to keep you going. The kids seem to love him and he always comes with these great philosophical statements that will hopefully get them somewhere in life, even if they are a little odd. One of my favorites being when we first meet him, he takes them bowling. Samantha is striking it out and Mason starts out not doing so well, complaining that he should just use the bumpers to which his dad replies, “You don’t want the bumpers. Life doesn’t give you bumpers.” Even during all the scenes we get with him and the following statements or notes in life we’ll be receiving, that one never seemed to leave me. Maybe it’s because it’s so simple and yet says so much about what comes as the years progress for young Mason. As the film progresses, we see him grow more attached to his dad as he’s the one who provides almost all the answers for him and his life. As for Samantha, she seems to grow less and less, providing one to three word sentences to finally just listening to her iPod as the boys talk. We’re never given a real reason as to why his mom and dad are divorced except for a small statement by his mom and a scene of Mason looking out the window and seeing them arguing so I think we’re meant to put the remaining pieces together by ourselves but then again, we don’t really need it. We’re looking at life through his eyes so in a way, we’re just as confused as he is.

The first hour, hour and a half of this film is made up of pure, simple nostalgia. Anyone who was born somewhere in the 90s who sees this film will probably have flashbacks of where they were in their life when they see certain moments of this film. There’s a scene where Samantha successfully annoys a sleeping Mason by singing one of Britney Spears’ latest tracks. When they first move, the soundtrack blasts Sheryl Crow’s “Soak Up the Sun”. Their mom reads the kids a passage from “Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire” and they even dress up and attend the midnight release of the latest book, “Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince” and while I myself have not done this, I can only imagine what that must’ve felt like. But then there’s a moment where dad discusses his kids about Bush and post-9/11 politics and just like “Margaret” a few years back, I’m taking back to a very confusing time in my childhood where we put the finger on an inexperienced president and demanded reasons for why we were doing what we were doing back then.

But as expected, as Mason gets older and older, the film becomes less cute and starts sucker-punching you with reality. His first stepdad who at first seems like a nice guy and is a college professor, has two kids from a previous marriage and it seems like a nice family. But then he forces Mason to get a haircut leaving him almost bald and starts to resent him. He then turns out to be a rather violent alcoholic causing mom and the kids to leave unexpectedly. The kids all ask her what’s going to happen and what to do next but she doesn’t have all the answers, a sad but true pain. I’ve never been a parent but I’ve seen those tears before through my mom when she didn’t have all the answers.

As stated before, all of mom’s ex-boyfriends/husbands (save for Ethan Hawke) all turn out to be alcoholic a-holes which lead to turning point moments of resentment. When Mason first has an encounter with alcohol, it’s not by choice, but more by pressure. The kids he’s hanging out with offer him and another friend beer and calling them “pussies” and “faggots” and saying that they’ll never get laid if they don’t do so. This is where the “after-school special” feel comes in and usually I’m not a fan of that because it’s nowhere near subtle and comes off as unintentionally cheesy but since we’re still seeing this through Mason’s perspective, you could say that that’s how he sees this. It’s my only flaw with the film but it’s completely overshadowed by everything else I’ve seen.

We see him do drugs, meet girls, make out, have sex, having hopes and dreams of wanting to be a photographer and even taking “artsy” pictures of the world around him, pretty much the basics of what a teenager on the verge of finding himself would do. But he also develops a very cynical personality based on the world around him judging from “things he reads” and his own past experiences. He asks his dad if there is any “real magic” in the world and then later on states to his girlfriend that we are all slaves to the technology that sits in the palm of our hand every hour of every day. He talks about the future and where his or the life of everyone else will go and as I’m watching, I too am asking that question. I may be done with high school and have my career set in front of me but even then, I too question what will happen in a year or so and fear the day I’ll have to make a choice. Yes, everyone else has to as will I but it’s a real fear and this film forces not just me but anyone who has this problem to really think about that.

It’s not a hard film to watch but it does question you to think about your life and whether or not you lived it the way you wanted to. If you’re an adult, then maybe you’ll flashback to a time when everything was simple for you since everyone on the internet seems to be obsessed with nostalgia as if it was a drug that will help you get through the day. Keep in mind, not every memory of “back in the day” is a good one, depends on who you are. Many of you will probably connect to Mason while I myself can’t. The only way I can is through his emotions and what he’s going through, a big one being the confusion he has due to a breakup with the person he thought was “the one”. The soundtrack is just simply incredible, each track layering the film and mood perfectly. We all have those memories that come with Sheryl Crow, Blink 182, Coldplay, Britney Spears, etc. playing on the radio or an intercom somewhere and it captures it just well. The soundtrack also develops as the years continue going from Phoenix to Lady Gaga to Gotye to Arcade Fire. This is literally the soundtrack of not just Mason’s youth but our youth as well and even today it keeps expanding. Also, I want a copy of Ethan Hawke’s “Black Album”. What is that? His own compilation of The Beatles post-breakup work, stating in the film as a birthday gift to Mason that there’s no real favorite Beatle and if you listen to them in their solo years in a row, it’s listening to them back together. That sounds like an awesome idea and I want to do it so bad!

What will happen to Mason? Well, that’s for you to find out or to answer yourself once the film ends. Maybe Richard Linklater will come back in ten years with “Adulthood” or something. Why not? If he can keep revisiting Jesse and Celine every ten years with the “Before” films, then why not here?

5/5 (and a lock for the best film of the year)

“Life Itself” Review By Tarek Fayoumi


20140716-142318-51798333.jpg

“Life Itself” is about a film critic that put so much effort into his film criticism to help people appreciate film as an art form. That man is Roger Ebert, he was a journalist since the age of fifteen, he got a job as a film critic, and became the biggest names of film critics in history. His criticism may have been outspoken often: since he was an only child, he was use to getting his way.

When Gene Siskel teamed up with Ebert for reviewing films, we see how both guys were different with film criticism. Ebert was all about the actual experience of the movie. I remember one time they were doing a segment on how to review films. He stated that if you give a movie a bad review, you need to know that your reader is going to read your review and know that they would like to see that movie. From this, Ebert taught many of us that there is no point in being extremely negative about a film to leave people feeling there is no reason they would want to see a certain film whatsoever. With Siskel, he liked to basically do his reviews moderate style and do it as if it was a current event to grab his readers attention. From this, I realized that Siskel was a bit more laid back than Roger, but that Roger may have been opinionated but his words made sense, just in a more negative tone at times.

James is able to keep his attention of important aspects of both critics to help viewers understand what they captivated Siskel and Ebert. I never knew that Ebert was not a TV person in the beginning compared to Siskel. Also I did not know that Ebert had to learn writing for TV before doing the show. No wonder why earlier on his TV segments, his talking seemed off, shy, or rushed.

Steve James’ film has the mellow-tone quality of how Ebert’s life was once he found out he had thyroid cancer. That is something he de does well with. We see Ebert’s motivation, his love of his life Chaz Ebert, and above all…how he wanted his voice to be heard when it came to the subject of movies.

The film sprints through two hours of mesmerizing interviews with friends, family, and celebrities. It makes a story that is not thorough to be a masterpiece. As Ebert once said, “No good movie is too long and no bad movie is short enough.” The length of the film is just right. The reason for the two hours of the film is because of how viewers have the opportunity to experience the life he lived. James made what he makes best was to prove that Life was, “The only thing that Roger loved more than movies.”

Dawn of The Planet of the Apes Review


dawn-planet-apes-new-release-date

“Dawn of the Planet of The Apes” is a daring film!

It is a great summer blockbuster, with great cinematography and captivating stunts that are similar to “Rise of the Planet of The Apes.” The technical aspects fits it. Cinematography: done by Michael Seresin (who did cinematography for “Midnight Express” (1978), and “Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban” (2004)). Editing: done by William Hoy (who did the editing for “I Robot” (2004), “300” (2007), and “Watchmen” (2009)) and is also done by Stan Stalfas (who did the editing for “Chernoby Diareis” (2012), and basically edited a bunch of TV shows).

Director Matt Reeves does a perfect continuation after “Rise of The Planet of the Apes” which released in 2011. in the beginning, the opening drags a little. It opens more with us viewers getting an idea of how the apes live their lives and the sign language they use to get around, given that most of them do not quite talk yet except Caesar (their leader and played by Andy Serkis who was brilliant as Gollum in “The Lord of the Rings Trilogy).

The opening introduces us to the corrupt world of human-life and how the apes live in it. Malcolm (Jason Clarke) is a man trying to generate electricity in New Orleans, Louisiana (the city where everyone is in). The problem is the growing nation has been evolved by apes and led by Caesar. The apes feel that human survivors are a threat of the devastating virus (unexplained) that was released a decade before everything turned to a disaster.

Flash forward with the friendship between Caesar and Koba (Toby Kebbell), where Caesar helped Koba break-free from the prison they were held in, in “Rise of the Planet of the Apes.” As Caesar starts to get along with the humans, Koba despises humans and begins to hate Caesar for it. For Koba to get his way and put humans at harm (which is what he enjoys doing), he gets acquainted with humans negatively to learn how to use their weaponry and kill them. This builds tension and soon builds a war between humans and apes, and apes who have been betrayed by other apes.

“Apes don’t want war!” Apparently, that statement is what causes anarchy between Koba and Caesar. As I watched “Planet of the Apes” this statement was what had me captivated, because most of the time in end-of-the-world films, it is started out with a conflict happening, and then boom war. With Caesar and Koba, Koba corrupts their friendship as he says, “Caesar loves humans more than apes,” and that is not all entirely true, but Caesar is quite aware that humans can also do good for the world and provide a proper home if everyone gets along.

This film is by far…a great summer blast. has its moments that dragged a bit but at moments of action it definitely blows you out of the water with apes flying everywhere and shooting machine guns. Literally…it is the whole bam, bam, bam, concept that you do not want to end. Three stars.

Treating cinema in many forms of art!