The Parenting Review


Parenting is a movie that I would refer to as a flick with many ensemble actors from many great TV series coming together in a house around Poltergeist sound effects. The twist here though, isthat they do not know how to handle it which is the cleverness of The Parenting. Directed by Craig Johnson, this time around his directing lifts the mood up. I say this because of his film The Skeleton Twins where features of his tended to have a stronger and sadder approach to a family dynamic. This one is where breaking the ice and dealing with a haunted house situation are the two conflicts he tangos with. 

The film centers around a gay couple, Rohan (played by Nik Dodani) and Josh (played by Brandon Flynn). Both have found success from starring in series on Netflix. Dodani was Zahid in Atypical, and Flynn was Justin Foley in 13 Reasons Why. Each series had a background of combating new relationships in many complicated scenarios. Here they are a couple having a weekend getaway at a vacation rental in hopes of having both of their families accepting their relationship. 

The parents of Rohan are played by Edie Falco and Brian Cox. Falco is one who has tons of success from the HBO series, The Sopranos, and Cox has just concluded Succession. Their roles of the parents have those lingering personality traits that raise eyebrows. Also, the parents of Josh are played by Lisa Kudrow and Dean Norris. They seem more like the stereotypical “normal” type of parents. Regardless, the dynamics of the families are written to inspire disaster at the finest level of sheercomedic joy.

As the family comes together in their home, there is already a lot of structure and disorganization abound—a lot of that because of Rohan and Josh having constant anxiety over how the trip with their parents will go. Also, the house has started to possess some strange moving parts. The film though is not scary, it is comedic. There are some moments of dark turns, but they actually make audiences think in the terms of how bad things can get.

As the visit continues to go awry, there is room for more to go downhill in an entertaining direction. Once the house has its “poltergeist” moments, more peril ensues. A creature runs around in unexpected angles of the home. One of the parents starts to become possessive and this is where the tension rises. When this individual becomes possessive, there is more that makes The Parenting feel like the happy family vibe is not so fulfilling. None of the characters take each other seriously, especially when they do not know how to handle all the falling apart moments of the vacation. 

The film takes the comedy approach and blends in darkness to create turmoil in order to build chemistry and uniqueness. Along the lines of its casting, all of the players have a diversity among personalities that blends well for this new brand of satire and dark comedy. In many moments it finds some breed of negativity, but it does not go overboard. It has a way of correlating the many unnerving factors to be one-of-a-kind.

There is chemistry that sets the funny focuses in motion way before the story gets rolling. Josh has issues with employment which makes Rohan appear to be the bread winner. At the same time, they keep trying to think of excuses or reasoning for their parents to look at them in a lighthearted perspective. When the bad cans of worms start to open at their vacation spot, more truths are revealed. The bad blood, the errors of the vacation, and the reading between all the lies thrive fluorescently. Once the tones of annoyance and aggravation find steepness, The Parenting is a title that defines itself. All the disasters paint a portrait of how maturity is in the form of arrested development.

The Parenting is faithful in its anxiousness for common ground to be found. It is broken by the more unfortunate episodes during the vacation. At the same time, it has a form of brilliance where the story and characters do not break. It is almost perfect yet not mesmerizing. Deep down lightness and darkness play to fuel the comedy of unexpectedness. Instead of finding the sadder components as Johnson did with The Skeleton Twins, it finds the ones of mind readers and egotistical characters. In a funny approach, those personalities are twisted by the reality of what is ahead. Three out of four stars for The Parenting.

Opus Review


Mark Anthony Green takes his audiences to a world where an icon has secrets. Opus revolves around a daring subject matter that correlates to some of the conflicts with artists today, similar to the many controversies surrounding Sean Diddy. Opus is a fictional approach to these topics; however, it has that cult aspect tied into the film extremely well. The navigation of getting a story into a world darker than one anticipates is a daring journey in Opus. The dark personality is shown through the eyes of Alfred Moretti, and he is played by John Malkovich. The calm aura of Malkovich’s performance is what makes Opusmore anxiety-provoking than audiences realize.

The film begins with a journalist named Ariel Ecton (played by Ayo Edebiri). She gets assigned to cover Moretti. It is a big story because he has been off the face of the Earth for ages. This is a massive opportunity for Ariel; however, it is one that goes much deeper than she assumes. She travels with her colleague, Clara Armstrong (played by Juliette Lewis) and her superior, Stan Sullivan (played by Murray Bartlett).  When they arrive at Moretti’s home there is already a bizarre setup—one that looks to have orders and rituals that all have glaring red flags attached.With his home being off the beaten path, there are bound to be a lot of mixed signals in Opus.

The notion of a journalist trying to get the real portrait of who an artist is keeps going underground, as in the pattern keeps evolving to be questionable and loses a sense of normalcy in Opus. The result is plenty of strangeness to the core. Somehow it exceeds its surrealness in the characterization as Malkovich portraying an emperor artist with an egotistical nature. Edebiri captures the elements of what makes one iconic and the true answers are of a disturbing nature. It is like a world where an icon has a level of fame like Michael Jackson and then introduces his own version of Neverland Ranch. The difference here is that it is more like an Eyes Wide Shut type dynamic. 

Opus carries a massive weight, because it challenges a fictional scenario that is based off events going on today with artists–especially when it comes to extreme behavior. The portrait it paints leaves the audience curious as to how one would feel if they were on the same journey as these journalists. The curious and surprising thing is that the shock values will have more humorous factors over horrid factors.

With the performance of Edebiri, I felt she is the hero of this awkward premise. Especially as she is trying to get her feet wet while attempting to capture stories that grasp the world. Her performance leaves a track of the risks that come with writing about the truth. The truth of Moretti is one-of-a-kind. Opuskeeps the momentum high as it swerves in motions of uncertainty as the journalist tests the waters to get the real story in this film. It delivers its risk-taking attitude with many punches that are more to bear than anything.  Cheesy, but vibrant with intense excellence in the persona of Malkovich. Three out of four stars for Opus.

Mickey 17 Review


Bong Joon Ho has navigated territories that are hard to overcome as a filmmaker. He is from South Korea and has directed films that have blown audiences out of the water, especially with Parasite winning many awards in 2020. It was one of the first international films to win Best Picture at the Academy Awards that year. From that aspect, the success of his work is how he ties themes together to create a purpose. Mickey 17 has that direction and approaches being monumental. The surfaces though, have tangents. It is a film based on the novel Mickey 7, written by Edward Ashton. Ho wrote the screenplay of this film and for those who know the foundations of his previous films, they will see the fantasy world through his eyes with Mickey 17.

Ho’s directing trait is that of having diversity among genres. Mickey 17 blends that aspect with the use of space and fantasy settings mixed with dark comedy layers. The film’s main character is Mickey Barnes, played by Robert Pattinson. The year is 2054 on an isolated planet orbiting in space. Pattinson’s voice is the narration of Mickey 17. It feels two-sided because his character is in the pattern of living and dying multiple times. Going forward, Mickey is used as a tool for high-risk endeavorswhere his many odd deaths come into play, simply because he is reusable. Under a strange and egotistical commander named Kenneth Marshall (played by Mark Ruffalo) and his wife Yifa(played by Toni Collette), Mickey must try to reassess his memories before his usage is thrown in the wrong direction, as itfrequently is. With the help of a friend, Timo (played by Steven Yeun), Mickey has does have some hope of accomplishing this. The mission though, is one that is bound to have many repeats.

The direction of Ho is bound to find its humorous aspect the purest form in Mickey 17. It is not as mesmerizing, but it is a film that feels like a video game or a sitcom on acid. This is especially true in modes where Pattinson is repeatedly talking to another version of himself, as it makes audiences curious as to which version is the brighter one. The various levels of seeming “brighter” go down a rabbit hole of catastrophic adventures with the planet and the orbit being at risk. Pattinson’s voice fuels the film with the narration providing continuous dialogue. For Ho, it is clear that he wants the full-on characterization on Pattinson.  The shifting of gears with conflicts and the world around Mickey 17 is a foundation that is complex and not always easy to follow. However, it is still a stellar film with great entertainmentvalue based upon its moving parts and qualities that endure throughout.

With Ruffalo and Collette in the roles of superiors, and Pattinson as the protagonist, it is a world that navigates its tracks by hovering over the surface. Their performances are not serious, but they build a well-crafted foundation for expectancy of a joyful ride off course. Ho is known to create disasters for cinematic effect, but I felt this time he did not accomplish much of that on the levels of his previous films. Still, Mickey 17 is well done and rapidly paced. Pattinson as one who is repeatedly disposed of and revived is where the volume of humor and contempt hit the fan here.  Mickey 17 is a universal voyage with many joyful turns that are unforgettable. Three out of four stars for Mickey 17.

Treating cinema in many forms of art!