Tag Archives: A24

Film reviews

The Brutalist Review

Leave a comment

Writer and director Brady Corbet is the champion of his craft with The Brutalist. A jolt to cinematic ambience that is mind-boggling and daring. A film that is set up chronologically in acts to vividly compel its audiences to want more. Laid out with an overture, separate acts, and an epilogue, The Brutalist gives its audience a chance to refuel their brains. At a running time of three hours and thirty-five minutes, there is a fifteen-minute intermission.

This drama of wonders is all centered-on Laszlo Toth (played by Adrien Brody). Laszlo is an architect that is vivid with his craft. His wife is Erzebet Toth (played by Felicity Jones). Laszlo and Erzebet escape from the post-war Europe in the year of 1947. Laszlo’s goal is to rebuild with his fascinating architecture. It is a swift period where industries, businesses, and landscapes play a role in the profits for projects to start up. It is a journey that encounters trial and error, while also building legacies for a bigger meaning. In examining the performance of Brody, he is destined to be Laszlo. The dedication he conveys paints a portrait of artistic fascination where there are no bounds.

The film paces itself—Laszlo finds himself in struggles with rebuilding his reputation at first. Also, trying to reconnect with his wife to start a new beginning poses a challenge. Corbet’s writing and continuity are vast with many dreams floating through the mind of Laszlo—he wants a life of success, but his passion for architecture leads to discord on many fronts. The times are heavy with political conflicts tying into other stressors and creating a presence of darkness.  As Laszlo realizes he is in front of the Statue of Liberty, he becomes destined to create opportunity for those he soon encounters in The Brutalist. 

The dark and successful days of Laszlo battle each other once he begins to work with clients. He starts to do work with Attila (played by Alessandro Nivola). This is a steppingstone, but then he gets a more rewarding opportunity. He is offered a commission to design a grand modernist monument. The one who gives him this job is Harrison Van Buren (played by Guy Pearce). Harrison’s son Harry Lee (played by Joe Alwyn) is also involved. This provides Laszlo with food, shelter, and a place for his wife Erzebet, but he questions if this is all of what he truly wants. The themes of wealth and greed play a role in the turmoil of Laszlo’s vision. With it being the era of modern America, The Brutalist loops in technological factors of to bedeeply frightening, stressful, and invigorating. 

Laszlo is his own scholar—attempting to make his craft and vision of what he wants to be unforgettable begins to be more than he can bear. The film’s depiction of Laszlo finding his ways to ease his stress and anger create an eerie presence. There is a lot to take in with The Brutalist. With the factor of modernization moving forward (after World War II), The Brutalist is an evolving reality of success with a trail of happiness waiting to be fulfilled. However, can Laszlo succeed at what he is assigned? Can he trust the egotistical wealthy minds surrounding the Van Buren family? Can he make the right choices and trust that life will be safe for Erzebet? There are many moving parts in The Brutalist. All of which challenge their own demons poetically and cinematically. It is authentic in its form of depicting the idea of never giving up while also dealing with artistic endeavors that remain unsupported in the world of profit.

When projects go downhill, so do the attitudes and trust of Laszlo, The Van Buren family, and his wife Erzebet. This is because the home of Laszlo is in the hands of the Van Buren family. Laszlo wants to rebuild his reputation and wants to keep creating the future of what he sees in his mind, but with the lack of structure, his ego spirals like crazy and leads to drinking, drug usage, attitude problems. The Brutalist dazzles with emotions.

The intermission is what helps its audience rebuild their thoughts before they continue with the other acts of the film. With the trail of Laszlo hitting roadblocks, The Brutalist is one that will keep building foundations of wonder and questions. The era of modern America is presented in an audacious form that I have not seen before, and it is all through the eyes of the performance of Brody. The Brutalist carries cinematography and scoring perfectly to maintain the emotions of its audience. It is set to know the moments of lightness and darkness. Brody’s performance is a monster of grandeur, brutality, and brilliance. Four out of four stars for The Brutalist.

Film reviews

Babygirl Review

Leave a comment

Nicole Kidman presents herself as someone who is voracious and power hungry. The title of Babygirl speaks for itself. Written and directed by Halina Reijn, the boundaries of the film go instantly awry. There is no filter to the film’s content or the norms to be violated. Babygirl is steamy! The more lines that are crossed, the more damage that is bound to be done.  Babygirl creates a dynamic where rules and superiors do not see eye-to-eye. Safety is only guaranteed when unwritten rules go unbroken. The writing has blurred lines in which violations lead to tension and the greater the risks, the more vivid the moments are. Babygirl is unlike anything I have seen before.

In the film, Kidman plays Romy, a well-known, successful CEO. She is persistent and always aiming to be at the top of her game. Her husband is Jacob (played by Antonio Banderas) and he works in the arts. The portrait is painted like they are one happy family until a young intern comes into her life. This intern is Samuel (played by Harris Dickinson) and he has a personality that is straightforward and belittling. He also plays his cards in a disturbing way to blindside. His nice guy attitude and his attention is irresistible for Romy. Soon, she finds herself in an affair with Samuel. With late night parties and secret hookups, Romy finds herself in bizarre place, both emotionally and on the job. It is only a matter of time before Romy and Samuel’s altered judgment lead to irreparable consequences.

As someone who grew up in and around professional business environments, Babygirl spoke to me and caused my head to swirl with thoughts about difficult workplace challenges. What are the penalties of making bad choices? Who is at fault? There is no positive advice in Babygirl. Both parties make poor choices, and the material portrays suggestive scenarios which are cinematically enticing and intriguing. The CEO status does not matter much in Babygirl, but the impact does.

The film has a theme of soul-searching which proves thought-provoking yet stressful and intriguing. The couple’s deep connection is morally wrong. The CEO’s ego finds itself in peril, and Kidman displays desires that she cannot control. Dickinson’s character has the upper hand as the dominant and Kidman plays the submissive. The competition for who pushes the boundaries harder is like watching a video game with two players trying to beat the levels of self-control.

The age differential causes lethal suspense in Babygirl. The writing focuses on the issues related to Kidman as a middle-aged executive and Dickinson as an evolving adult intern. There are ways in which both have an upper hand, but neither can escape the detrimental career and personal consequences of their actions. Babygirl is the death match of ageism played out in an office setting.

The entire film illustrates examples of the various violations possible in the workplace. The atmosphere and characterizations are bold and engrossing, especially when there are kinky games and threatening scenarios. The display of human darkness is immense and lead to on going instances of being blindsided.What will the outcome be for the CEO’s family? Will innocence and irresistibility lead to shocking and edgy discoveries?

Babygirl had me sold. It is a hard R with many revolving doors waiting to be opened. Kidman and Dickinson are a pair destined for extravagant destruction.  Audiences will be left thinking about how much reassessing will need to come into play givenhow out of hand the situation gets. Kidman and Dickinson are a combative duo fueling the fire with each other. Regardless of how insane it gets, it is superb. Three-and-a-half out of four stars.

Film reviews

Queer Review

Leave a comment

This was on the road to feeling like a masterpiece, yet it fell short in its continuity. Luca Guadagnino is a director whose soul searches for meaning to wondrous extents in his previous successful projects, Call Me by Your Name (2017), Suspiria (2018), and Bones and All (2022). However, with Queer the artistic approaches are in disarray. Daniel Craig plays the lead and his performance is one that is revolutionary in its emotional depth, but the context of the film’s conflicts continues to grow in weird directions making Queer lack the component of brilliance.

The movie takes place in Mexico City in the 1950s. Craig plays William Lee, an introvert with a closeted sexual identity and an addiction to heroin. He spends a lot of his days in a café awaiting a connection, and many times he is caught-up with his buddy Joe Guidry (played by Jason Schwartzman). They spend their days being fascinated with booze and cigarettes. All of William’s priorities shift when he sets eyes on Eugene Allerton (played by Drew Starkey), a student that William begins to form a close relationship with. Once they begin to start up a friendship, Queer goes from feeling experimental to an over-the-top blur of a picture.

The film has three acts and an epilogue. This is a steady setup because it is one of those dark dramas where pacing will seem necessary. Guadagnino’s approach is to use the dynamic of their very separate personalities to create the tension of the story. William just desperately needs to feel connected and he cannot control his drug and alcohol abuse. Eugene is a student who is simply going with the flow, yet he knows how to set his boundaries. “Boundaries” is where Queer is lacking in the elements to create a phenomenon between the two.

In defining its poor quality, it is not one of a negative extent, it just tries too hard to the point where the moments feel out-of-focus. It goes from solitude to connection, and then to addictions in the picture. The resolution of the underlying conflicts from William’s issues leads the film into an odyssey. Much of the dramatizations are developed and expressed in a way that gives audiences the feeling that they too are tripping on some sort of drug. This quality is cinematic; however, it did not have me soldsince the title in and of itself is one where the expectation would be characters finding what their hearts want.

As I have said, Guadagnino knows how to form characterizations, and he desperately tries to with Queer, but the approach to be universal in nature (based on underlying conflicts) is where Queer displays a presentation of shame. The performances of Craig and Starkey are a knockout, but the setup of their paths and expectations of each other are in shambles. Its form of creating character components and comparisons that are supposed to bond these two keeps blindsiding its audience with lots of head-scratching. Queer is a portrait of a battle where sexuality, addiction, and finding the common ground lack thoroughness and understanding. It tries to seem universal and one-of-a-kind, however the measure in Queer does not get that high with accomplishing much astonishment. Two-out-out of four stars.