Tag Archives: Film reviews

Film reviews

The Instigators Review

Leave a comment

Matt Damon ( left) and Casey Affleck (right) in The Instigators

A flick with a heist and troublemakers always has quirky misdirection when its characters are alumni of Good Will Hunting. That film is The Instigators, directed by Doug Liman. Matt Damon and Casey Affleck reunite for the thrill ride of many errors of spellbinding fun. The Instigators made me feel “instigated.” With all the routines of questioning behavior going awry and no end in sight, there is a lot in The Instigators. It is like Damon and Affleck revisiting their hometown in Boston, and their behaviors have gotten more dangerous since Good Will Hunting. It is not detrimental to show and is to make money. The Instigators will boil the screen of the comedic aspects of Damon and Affleck.

In The Instigators, Damon is Rory; Affleck is Cobby. Rory is an ex-Marine; Cobby is an ex-con. Rory has debt. Rory has scenarios ranging from divorce, child support, missed fees, and just debt piling up. Cobby is just one who needs to get his life together, and he feels he does not find common sense in his daily routines. Cobby’s time is at a bar at all hours of the day. He even fakes his breathalyzer tests. The hardship side of its characterizations loops in a conspiracy to have a heavy component in The Instigators—if it goes well, everyone goes home with money to help them get by.

The crime boss is Mr. Besegai (played by Michael Stuhlbarg). He assigns the game plan of the heist to Rory and Cobby. The plan involves Mayor Micelli (played by Ron Perlman). The robbery went wrong. Rory and Cobby are on the run after the failed mission. They are searching for places to hide. They stroll through the Boston area repeatedly. As this goes on, the feds are after them, and on top of that, Mr. Besegai finds himself in a pattern where he considers trying to run or hide. That is sadly more difficult than it seems. Especially with how national news takes over, and the city of Boston has tons of witnesses. The superior character to the feds is Francis (played by Ving Rhames). Francis has got the tanks, and the crew, and it is more than Boston could handle. The question is who survives.

The film keeps its momentum of rollercoaster fun. It keeps the misdirection of events turning into circles, characters questioning who to trust, and the ball rotates courts throughout the failed crime. The chase builds. The biggest twist is Rory’s therapist takes part in this runaway. The therapist is Dr. Donna Rivera (played by Hong Chau). Her presence in all of this brings in a layer of thought. There are conversations where she mentions liability, insurance, and her duties—how much damages will be compensated for all the typhoon madness in The Instigators? Liman’s direction always has a knack for selecting characters that are street smart. Not those who are book smart. “Street smart” works to the advantage of the title itself. The many rounds of car accidents and explosions are continuous throughout The Instigators. It is unstoppable in its tracks.

The Instigators is an adventure. It is joyful and entertaining for a flick with Damon and Affleck. It is silly in moments. The writing is dry in some. I enjoyed it, but I did not love it. I feel, however, that it is the right approach to tying in an exciting adventure with Damon and Affleck reunited once again. How crazy is the heist? How smart is everyone associated? Is there a cut in the money? Find out in The Instigators. Two-and-a-half out of four stars.

Film reviews

Dance First Review

Leave a comment

Gabriel Byrne as Samuel Beckett

When I watch a movie with Gabriel Byrne, I think about his role as Paul Weston from the HBO series In Treatment. That is because he plays a role as a counselor trying to help others navigate the challenges of their life as he is trying to navigate his as well. His role in Dance First displays a comparative direction. He plays Samuel Beckett. In his role, he is learning through the ropes of trial and error as a playwright and philanthropist. Dance First is a direction of looking through the depths and the persona of Beckett himself. No one plays the role better than Byrne.

Dance First starts with Beckett in the heat of a monumental production. Before the production begins, he finds himself at odds. He is in a pattern of trying to figure out the good and the bad of his upbringing. That is because his path to being a playwright was not easy. Living through a life of all kinds of experiences, the door for him to feel greater feels like a halting point. The “halting point” is all that Beckett himself went through to gain a form of a craft. The path of the film is trial and error to the core. It is revitalizing of an auteur nature.

Most of the film focuses on the young Samuel Beckett. The younger version is played by Fionn O’Shea. It brings us through his turmoil with his family. That brings us to   James Joyce (played by Aidan Gillen) and his family. Beckett is navigating his expectations (even when he does not want to). That is because that is how he can develop his craft. With the family of Joyce, he builds a relationship with Lucia Joyce. She is the daughter of the family and is played by Grainne Good. Beckett’s personality is one of a few words. His style brings him into a landscape of different adventures.

As the film’s writing brings in Beckett gaining perspective on himself, real-life events play a part additionally. Beckett is a resistant survivor of World War II with Alfred Peron (played by Robert Aramayo), this is a factor in humanistic growth. The events of World War II are what loops Beckett’s feelings for Suzanne. Young Suzanne is performed by Leonie Lojkine, and Old Suzanne is performed by Sandrine Bonnaire. The personality of strength comes into play very thoroughly with a feeling of in-depth connectivity. Beckett may be in love, but he is still dealing with many demons. They are in their demise mentally.

The film is black-and-white—a mosaic of a man’s challenge and shame where the cinematography is in tune with the era of Beckett himself. As young Beckett is displayed, the film transitions to the older Beckett talking to another version of himself. It is like Beckett going back and forth trying to figure out how to put the pieces of what fits in his mind accurately. The writing of the film is presented like a play. I felt the audacity of frustration and sadness. I felt feelings of inadequacy, and that I was face-to-face with the reality of life finding meaning from Beckett himself.

The essence of love and enrichment is at the core of the performance of Shaw and Byrne as Beckett. As I have said Byrne makes me think of his role on In Treatment, this felt like a ride that was three times that height of emotions. More on terms with doing what it takes to put despair to good use. “Despair to good use” in creating something prolific, spellbinding, and life changing. Dance First is the life of one being controlled by many factors…but his words and his craft are of importance. There is a purpose to find the surreal keys of connection. I rate three-and-a-half out of four stars for Dance First.

Film reviews

Oddity Review

Leave a comment

Psychological horror is on the verge of a mystery—a structure with moving parts where there is more to the puzzle (than what audiences think). Much of that aspect is in Oddity. Written and directed by Damian Mc Carthy, it is a blindsiding ride of surrealism. It is a mystery of covered-up aspects. It brings in despair with questions. Who was the cause of the death? Who had previous conflicts before a death occurred? The theme of materialized aspects in the direction of mental health and stability fuels Oddity.

Oddity takes place in Ireland. Its main characters are Ted (played by Gwilym Lee), Darcy (played by Carolyn Bracken), and Yana (played by Caroline Menton). Lee is the head doctor of a psychological hospital. His wife Dani (also played by Bracken). Dani is dead. Darcy is a psychic medium. She believes she can see the truth. The “truth” contains a clear portrait of who is responsible for Dani’s death. Darcy owns an “oddity” shop.

The film brings in the usage of personification where my mind had captivation. Darcy sets up a creature-like mannequin in the home of Ted and Yana. This process is to help her cue the truth about Dani’s death. This process uncovers hidden gems in Oddity. Is there a story behind what has happened? Is Darcy crazy? Is Ted crazy? Did Dani have parts of her life that no one knew about?

The trait of the film’s psychological tone is Darcy being blind. That is because she is the one mentioning moving parts that concern Yana. Ted is more on the same page (since this is Dani’s sister). With Ted having a mentally stressful job at a mental hospital, his thought process has a halting point when it comes to Darcy. The direction (of the characters) is like all the characters want to find light.

My fascination with Oddity is the factor it brings in for its audience to think of the opposite. It begins with an introduction of events. They are ones of violence in Oddity. The pieces are scattered. The key to the truth lies in Oddity. There is no resolution without the full scope. “Full scope” of what there is for truth.

With the development of characters’ questioning behaviors, Oddity is a wrath of personality turmoil. Yana is one in this category. With Yana terrified of Darcy’s moving parts, there is the assumption that Darcy presents a form of uncertainty. That heightens Yana’s vulnerability since she is alone with Darcy frequently. There is that momentum of scarcity with brutality awaiting among the “wrath of personality turmoil” in Oddity.

Oddity is one of the most brilliant and terrifying revelations I have seen. It changed my perception of how terror of minds loops in twists of spellbinding revelations. Mc Carthy knows how to set up a form of mystery with presence. “Presence” is within what is right and wrong with the puzzle in Oddity. How did Dani die? Can Darcy put it together? Is it all a myth? Find out in Oddity. Three-and-a-half out of four stars.