Tag Archives: Focus Features

Anemone Review


Daniel Day-Lewis once said he was done with acting after Phantom Thread. That is not the case with Anemone where he is back as an actor on top of his craft portraying someone with vengeance. The story’s writing has a foundation based on solitude and layers of underlying conflicts that go way back. The director is Daniel’s son Ronan Day-Lewis. Daniel wrote the film with his son. Anemone is a film about resentment, challenges, and acceptance. In a cinematic sense, it explores the question of when enough is enough. That question expands for seemingly endless miles in Anemone, across the unique landscapes, waters, and shores of Northern England. The vast landscapes weave all kinds of feelings through a dark and rugged terrain of cinematic wonders.

Daniel Day-Lewis plays Ray and Sean Bean plays Jem. Theirs is a brotherhood filled with hatred over many years and a dynamic that is completely thunderous with conflict. Much of this stems from the performance of Day-Lewis which is often rapid and petrifying. He always has a way to give emotion to humanistic characteristics when weaving in his character’s anger. Jem decides to try to make peace with Ray because he had an affair with Ray’s wife. A confusing dynamic is then created for Ray’s son Brian (Samuel Bottomley). Ray’s former lover Nessa (Samantha Morton) is now with Jem. She has tried countless times to reconnect with Ray, due to her concerns about Brian. Throughout this film, a bad past will simply not let go.

One of the most daring and egotistical portrayals I have seen from the talented Daniel Day-Lewis. He plays the role of wanting his vengeance to linger so well. He has that mind-boggling voice and twisted sense of humor that is not one to contend with. Sean Bean’s character keeps trying to make peace while also holding his anger. However, at the same time, the brotherhood connection remains strong. Elements of hate linger in cinematic qualities that are just beautiful yet monstrous. Daniel’s son, Ronan, has an effective eye for capturing humanistic qualities which explode given the anger although there are times when alternative outlets might be much healthier. 

The film is thought-provoking as it goes into uncharted territory that can chill audiences’ guts to the bone. The hatred in the performance of Daniel Day-Lewis, and the frustration in the performance of Sean Bean are both so pure. It is a brotherhood filled with jealousy fueled by masculinity which causes the film to hit a cinematic reel of glory. The story hits it so hard becausethese actors’ efforts to burn up the screen succeed. Anemone may be one of the best films of 2025, and another resurrection of Daniel Day-Lewis. His life as an actor will always include spell-binding performances. He has a unique ability to bring back sides of his artistic repertoire with even more aggressive and thought-provoking performances. He always shines brightest in the British landscape where there is a setting of solitude. Three-and-a-half stars for Anemone.

 

The Roses Review


This is a film in which the subject of change finds common ground. Storylines that focus on relationships tend to have an appeal that leads to a deeper narrative. The narrative in The Roses results in an expanded portrait. Directed by Jay Roach, this film has a form of transformative humor that is special. The Roses presents a negative dynamic that gradually gets worse, but at the same time it thrives with humoristic value within the depths of its dark comedy. With Benedict Cumberbatch and Olivia Colman playing a husband and wife, and Andy Samberg and Kate McKinnon playing spouses as witnesses—the challenges are explored through a clever style of writing. The dramatic downfall results in the epitome of wonderful creativity in The Roses.

The film features Theo and Ivy Rose (Cumberbatch and Colman), and a couple that are facing several hurdles. They present a positive attitude about life, but then jealousy rears its ugly head. Theo was once a successful entrepreneur, but then later encounters some flaws. This causes Ivy to be the bigger breadwinner in the family. As Theo spends more time at home, he gets their kids to be more actively sporty and involved with life. Their friends Barry and Amy (Samberg and McKinnon) sense a form of injustice. At the same time, the success Theo and Ivy are experiencing is presented in a way that leads to unexpected, envious results.

To elaborate, I found this film to be classy. The subject matter made me think about what families disagree about and what parents might feel they are doing in terms of their parenting skills. The format of the writing seems to be in “keep the peace” mode, but gradually there is a mental ring of fire that boils the pot silently and ferociously. Lots of the intensity comes from Ivy, and because her kids are thriving based on what their dad has taught them. The competitive issues faced by the Rose family lead to a variety of interesting scenarios in The Roses.

To transition my train of thought a bit, the bright side of life also sparks glimmers of hope and optimism in The Roses. The challenges caused by failures end up opening new approaches to life which have better outcomes. There are moments of conflict, quirks, and giggles, but many scenes are presented with exaggerated and drastic measures. My point, however, is that the story presents how hard it can be to accept how things in life sometimes turn out. The pursuit of success not always being what it is cracked up to be is uncovered in The Roses.

Overall, the movie is a lovely portrait of a couple discovering more about what their guts are telling them. The family values portrayed through the performances of Cumberbatch and Colman are priceless and should not be missed. These actors are true gems which results in a film that is just shy of outstanding. The writing is classical. The Roses is filled with hidden envy, but reminds audiences to love and accept family. Three-and-a-half out of four stars.

Honey Don’t! Review


Actresses Margaret Qualley and Aubrey Plaza are a hurricane of fun and mysterious characterizations. Honey Don’t! is a unique crime thriller and dark comedy. This film feels experimental-because it pushes all kinds of limits while also finding humor in moments that should not be so funny. Directed by Ethan Coen, horrid behaviors thrive in an immersive way. It is like Fargo with some hidden gems, but in the end is unable to fulfill its potential brilliance.

The film focuses on Honey O’Donahue (Qualley), a lesbian detective making all kinds of eerie choices while also navigating weird crimes. Many of the issues are entangled with a church run by the mysterious Reverend Drew Devlin (played by Chris Evans). He is a reverend up to all kinds of shady activities when he is off duty. With murders and various crimes occurring, Honey’s mind is boggled.  In addition, she is busy trying to find love for a colleague, MG Falcone (Plaza). The two establish a secret. loving relationship. At the same time, the small-town that Honey patrols remain at odds given the murders and the shady Reverend Devlin. As the story progresses, the circumstances surrounding the unexplained crimes get even messier.

It is a film in which all the characters are two-sided. The elements needed to explore trust in relationships are perfect for this set of characters, but the execution falls short. This is likely due to how Ethan writes his scripts which normally entailtragedy and sad endings. At other times, Ethan’s scripts leave his viewers twisted. There is much that is twisted in Honey Don’t!, including Honey’s bad choices. Not one of the characters is up to par in this film. However, Honey Don’t! is vibrant with interesting layers of tragedy that continue to make attempts to get to the truth. Unfortunately, things fall apart quite early, which has an impact on the film’s overall enjoyability.

The storyline veers away from the crime scenarios to try to focus more on the risky behaviors in pursuit of adding somejoyfulness in the film. This was a turn off for me because I was expecting lots of laughs from cleverness since it is written by one of the Coen brothers. I did not get much of that but instead got a whole lot of intimate moments that seemed unwritten. The performances were magnificent, but the connection to the plot was limited. In the end, the film fell short of its potential.  

Honey Don’t! became increasingly strange as it went on due to the detective wanting her own desires to be fulfilled. The sameissue applies to the Reverend. The roles of superiority should befunny and attention-grabbing, but their characterizations were written poorly. Also, there were too many random ideas that fell in and out of place which were equally flawed because their outcomes were predictable. This is far from my favorite film byEthan Coen, but at least the writing was effective in generating some momentum. Two out of four stars for Honey Don’t!