All posts by Tarek Fayoumi…The Paterson of his Craft!

I am someone who strives to become a professional critic. I watch and review many movies. I view the eyes of movies as something as an art form. I have followed many critics over the years, but once I was thirteen I knew writing film reviews was going to be my passion. I learned from watching multiple episodes of Ebert And Roeper in my teen years, and then in middle school I began writing film reviews for a newspaper club. I am also an avid fan of the arts of Chicago including Theatre, Comedy, and music. Films, however, are my primary focus.

The Criterion Channel’s Red Road Review


 

 

 

Red Road movie review & film summary (2007) | Roger Ebert

 

While still being in quarantine, The Criterion Channel has allowed me to explore and figure out why particular films fall under the category of Criterion. I came across the 2006 thriller and drama, Red Road (directed by Andrea Arnold). Red Road is a contemporary film in which the main character, Jackie (played by Katie Dickie), finds herself warped in an obsession with following someone who has impacted her life in the past. Jackie monitors security cameras daily to catch anything that looks suspicious or crime related. Red Road is a quiet film with faded cinematography which effectively depicts Jackie’s obsession which leads her on a trail to seek revenge.

The film takes place in the United Kingdom. Jackie works as a CCTV security operator and her mind is always consumed with identifying emergencies. That all changes when she comes across a man on the monitors that has caused severe damage and (supposedly) was the reason why she has suffered from post-traumatic-stress-disorder for some time. In the film, we learn that Jackie lost a daughter, and she believes Clyde (played by Tony Curran) was the reason for that tragedy. As Jackie becomes fixated on following Clyde’s everyday adventures on the security monitors, she feels compelled to follow him. She starts to exhibit elements of stalkerish behavior, and it is not just through the security monitors, but by involving herself in his life outside of her job. This leads to Jackie to put herself in some harmful situations as she is determined to figure out if the damage he caused her was intentional or accidental.

Red Road’s tone was subdued but technologically inviting. I was captivated by the film, not due to the story alone, but because of its technological brilliance. The realism of the emotional story is shown through the method of the Dogme 95 movement. This is where the cinematography is in use with visceral handheld camera work and natural lighting. Since the film had no high-end cinematography computer effects, it makes Red Road feel like the main characters are in a real-life conflict especially through the showcasing of Jackie’s emotions. The film’s conflict is realistic in that it is not unusual for someone to wants answers to why their life may have had a tragic encounter.

I found that the film was intriguing due to the outcomes of Jackie’s persistent, stalkerish behavior. There are moments where she over assumes what may or may not be true. Also, she realizes that elements of Clyde are what she believed them to be. And, with Clyde’s dark past, her judgment impacts him more by causing additional legal troubles, given he already is on parole due to prior charges. This makes Jackie start to consider if she wants him to suffer more or if she wants to understand whether the tragedy which impacted her was truly a mistake as many car accidents are.  Red Road is a film that is a journey searching for answers through both security cameras and personal stalking.

This film is not for everyone and reviews have been mixed over time. I feel like it does fit with the Criterion Channel and because of its contemporary technical advancements. Red Road is a film that speaks to a limited type of audience, an audience who can handle emotional elements, and who feel that true independent movies speak to them. Red Road is a cleverly crafted thriller, but it is not amazing. However, it did hold my attention through the natural cinematography that the film has throughout its two-hour running time. I give Red Road three stars.

The Criterion Collection’s Fish Tank Review


 

Fish Tank (film) - Wikipedia

 

In 2009, director Andrea Arnold won the Cannes Jury Prize for Fish Tank. It is a film which is part of the Criterion Collection, an impressive collection of important classic and contemporary films. Fish Tank is a contemporary film on so many levels. It portrays real-life challenges that people deal with today. The film gears on anxiety, depression, and low self-esteem suffered by an adolescent growing up in a broken home where she is desperate for attention.

The film takes place in the projects of the United Kingdom. Mia (played by Katie Jarvis) lives an Essex Estate with her abusive, cruel, self-centered, and alcoholic mother along with her negative little sister. Due to Mia’s attitude and destructive behavior, she has been kicked out of school and is waiting to hear if she can go to an alternative school due to her explosive behavior. She continues to be a vocal and harsh adolescent that only sees more negatives than positives day-after-day. Mia finally starts to feel cared for when her Mom introduces her to new boyfriend, Connor (played by Michael Fassbender). Connor is as immature as Mia’s mother, but he is more welcoming and friendly than her. Connor starts to grow on Mia. However, after an inappropriate, intimate situation between Mia and Connor which Mia cherishes, her world starts to crumble even more.

Fish Tank shows that Mia wants to feel cared for, and the scenario between her and Connor crosses boundaries that are a red flag. Given, Mia already has a life where her mother does not care about her at all, she feels drawn to and connected with Connor. Mia is fifteen and Connor is twice her age. This leads Connor to want to disconnect from Mia and her mom due to the risqué scenario that he put himself in with Mia.  Throughout the movie, I felt like I was following Mia while she sought to resolve the conflict with Connor. The theme is dark, yet inviting, and the film portrays it well with dark cinematography where it is clear that Mia is only making matters more emotional for herself.

The film has a generous amount of realistic anxiety which the viewer feels watching Fish Tank. At one point when Mia is in a huge dispute with her mother (she is in a dispute in almost every scene with her mother), she screams “You’re what’s wrong with me!” That quote rings true to the Mia’s upbringing and the source of her harsh attitude. Viewers will find it obvious that she was not raised properly. Her mother is always drinking or dozing off into space, and whenever her and Mia talk, it turns into World War III. This shows why Mia is determined to feel connected to Connor (even though it is inappropriate). She feels he will care for her, but the film shows that this relationship has serious consequences.

Fish Tank is realistic filmmaking at its finest. The film accurately depicts the problems many adolescents from broken homes tend to face in today’s world. The film also shows that Mia has limited options when it comes to finding an escape to help better herself. She feels Connor can be that for her. Due to what she has lived with most of her life (being raised in a broken home with an abusive mother), she does not fully comprehend the consequences of her actions. Due to the film’s realism and effectiveness at showing a dire situation in a poetic way, I give Fish Tank three and a half stars.

Proof Review


 

Proof (2005 film) - Wikipedia

 

While still in quarantine, I decided to watch the 2005 film directed by John Madden, Proof. I was set to see the play, but due to the COVID-19 was cancelled so I decided to watch the movie instead. The film is based on the play written by David Auburn and takes place in Chicago. I felt that watching a movie where Chicago is the main location would help me to feel more hopeful about returning to the city soon. The subject of Proof is challenging and enthralling. The film gears on scenarios related to mathematics and grief. Those two subjects cause tension to set in which reveals the film’s conflict. The questions that the main characters have do not seem correct or inaccurate based on the realizations they come across after the death of a father and genius math professor.

The main character is Catherine (played by Gwyneth Paltrow), and there was a point where she was driven and disciplined for academic success. This was all because her father, Robert (played by Anthony Hopkins), always pushed her to go beyond boundaries in terms of mathematical subjects and equations. He is a well-known and beloved professor of Mathematics at the University of Chicago. Catherine’s life hits a plateau when her father becomes sick and she withdraws from school to take care of him. She has plans to return to a prestigious school, but her motivation for success is paused after the death of her father. There are moments when they are in discussions (shown as flashbacks from when he was alive) about various subjects and other times when they are simply socializing. Catherine thinks back to those moments wishing she would have made better decisions before his death.

After his death, one of Robert’s former students, Hal (played by Jake Gyllenhaal) comes into Catherine’s life. Hal brings to her attention mathematical equations, proofs and theories which are genius and could lead to future brilliant publications. Catherine is hesitant about this at first, but then she discovers in one her father’s many notebooks of equations that she possesses similar or identical patterns to his writing and his thinking. This makes her realize she could have inherited the incredible mind of her father and she can choose whether to use it for her own success. The motivation for her is mixed because one side of her is motivated by her estranged sister, Claire (played by Hope Davis), to start a new life in New York. However, the other side of her may want to continue to do mathematics and figure out if she can solve life-changing theories like her father was able to. Catherine’s mind is blank with what to do because she feels that continuing to seek achievement through the eyes of her father will only make her feel more depressed, but she also feels she has already let him down so there can still be hope. Hal is the one who tries to encourage her to continue what her father started with the mathematical theories he had not completed.

I find Proof, the film, to be encouraging because it illustrates how one can live life for the better once a tragic scenario has happened. I felt that Catherine’s character had the opportunity to do better for herself if she continued life in the eyes of her father whose talent she inherited. The film’s moments of jumping back and forth from the past when her father was alive to the present time, gives viewers an idea of which scenarios play into her not being able to make a decision that seems right to her. The message is to not give up what one enjoys doing. Catherine is devoted to her mathematical skills and she does want to carry on the legacy of her father’s brilliance. Hal wants her to as well.

With Proof there may be theories that are revolutionary. Catherine may be able to solve them with the help of Hal, but with her father having passed, the motivation is a challenge. The film’s emotions are honest, faithful, and gripping. I found that there are moments of both satisfaction and dissatisfaction. Overall, the movie reminds viewers that life can be challenging and there is nothing wrong with struggling and wanting to get better. Catherine can get better if she puts her mind to it. I give Proof four stars.