Category Archives: Film reviews

CinemaCon 2026-Reclaiming Cultural Moments Locally and Globally-Movies with Tarek


With CinemaCon at Caesars Palace in Las Vegas, Nevada, there are so many things in the movie industry that continue to speak. There is the money, the concessions, and the audience. We live in a world where attendance in theatres still tends to ebb and flow. Since I work in the industry, I see it from many angles and understand the challenges who are doing all they can to survive. Cinemas today must implement many creative ways to make profits to stay afloat. 

Daniel Loria moderated a discussion with Shannah Miller, Laura Najilis, Christof Paposuck, and David Sieden. All of them are leaders in the cinema industry. They talked about how they have tried to fill seats and boost attendance. The person who I connected most though was Shannah because I attend and cover many events from Fathom Entertainment. She provided insightsinto how particular days drive patterns and create regulars. She also mentioned that playing films on Sundays speaks to audiences because of a church and movie combination. In addition, she mentioned that playing films on Wednesdays creates a pattern for growth since it allows for events that appeal to different age ranges. The cinema world can be rewarding to all kinds of audiences if there are features to keep theatres thriving by attracting traffic.

There were also conversations about movie memberships. This is where Najilis, Paposuck, and Sieden contributed and discussed their operations. In each cash, the operations of sales and attention-grabbing captivations play an important role. Overall, there are different ways of implementing pricing and membership strategies. Both of those elements drive revenue as well. Buyers consider how best to utilize their memberships to enhance opportunities for movie experiences. I found this conversation fascinating in that I see the cinema world almost every day of my life. I often contemplate what is the primary inspiration that motivates a person to go to the movies. Apparently, it is not just the movie itself, but also the many different features that cinemas offer audiences.

The State of the Industry and Neon Presentation-CinemaCon 2026-Movies with Tarek


On April 14, 2026, in the Dolby Colosseum, President of G Kids, Dave Jesteadt, announced new features. The director of Godzilla Minus Zero Takasha Yamazaki came to the stage to share thoughts on the success of Godzilla Minus One. There were reminders about how technological, sound, and support brought innovation which led to the success of Godzilla Minus One. Yamazaki mentioned how he believes that cinemas are the only way to experience films. 1954 is the year that Godzilla first found popularity in Japan. Godzilla Minus One was filmed for IMAX.

Godzilla Minus Zero is a direct sequel from Godzilla Minus One. Yamazaki mentioned that he is excited for Godzilla Minus Zero to keep audiences returning to cinemas. Yamazaki showedfootage and clips of Godzilla Minus Zero. He then shared clips of production and then the Teaser World Premiere trailer. The film starts November 6, 2026.

There was also a presentation on the MPA Film rating system. The issues covered included standards, ratings, and safety in movie content. This topic is interesting to me, because I have loved movies since I was a young boy and still do today. There are various opinions on the subject. Innovation and copyrights play a role, yet it is essential that ratings be taken seriously.Charles H. Rivkin, the CEO of the Motion Picture Association, shared his opinions on the matter.

There were also discussions about the Belcourt Theatre in Nashville, Tennessee. It is a cinema that goes way back inhistory. This topic spoke to me, because reinforces how important movie theatres are to vibrant communities. Stephanie Silverman is the director of the Belcourt Theatre. She introduced Michael O’Leary, the president and CEO of Cinema United. My favorite quote in O’Leary’s presentation was, “Movies are how the world talks to each other.” He showcased examples of how cinemas often create their own themes to bring more rewarding moments for guests.

Neon wrapped up the presentation with their slate of upcoming films which include The Young People and I Love Boosters. Elissa Federoff is the Chief Distribution Officer at Neon, and she came to the stage to mention their many accomplishments.Sumyi Khong Antonson is the executive vice president of Neon, and she mentioned the box office success many Neon films. There was lots of inspiration from both speakers. Hokum opens May 1 of this year. Adam Scott came to the stage and talked about how he wanted to do movies all his life. Lots of other announcements from Neon combined with other cultural elements created a memorable start to CinemaCon 2026. For me, the feeling was surreal as I was immersed in the uniquewonders of new imaginations.

Faces of Death Review


Grisly murders have a way of catching the attention of audiences, especially those who can handle gory scenes. Violence sells, but one must take into consideration what appears real and what seems fake. Faces of Death loops in popularity and context which combine in a horrid nightmare. The graphics are mesmerizing, yet the characterizations are somewhat sloppy at times. It is technically a remake of the film Faces of Death from 1978. The twist, however, is the murderer finds inspiration from that 1978 flick. The narration in the film fuels his rage. The aggressiveness in the story is eerie, but the film relies on oozing violence to appear realistic. In the end, I found it more funny than spooky. 

The film focuses on a lady named Margot, played by Barbie Ferreira. She has a day job moderating content online. She is also getting over a horrid event involving a train accident. So, disturbing imagery comes to her attention frequently since her brain is wired to notice when something looks wrong. She begins to moderate videos by a man named Arthur, played by Dacre Montgomery. Arthur is a man who has a normal life with a day job, but outside of work, he tracks down victims to broadcast them in his murder videos. His numbers, his fanbase, and the 1978 version of Faces of Death is his inspiration. Margot begins to utilize technology to track him down.

There is a vengeance that is greedy in Faces of Death. The film’s writing provides context that shows how human errors lead to increased determination. This is achieved through the characterizations of both Margot (the hero) and Arthur (the antagonist). When Margot feels no one is helping her, she abuses technology. When Arthur feels his vengeance is not enough, he continues to find more disturbing tactics for demolishment. There is more fuel for danger and treachery than meets the eye in Faces of Death.

Unfortunately, the film is a bit sloppy. Arthur as a murderer does not fit the bill well although Margot fits the hero role very well. I felt more terror from seeing Margot tracking down Arthur, than Arthur in his killing mode. Faces of Death is like a horror of reversed psychology where the writing does not have the characterizations properly in tune. Both characters have egotistical minds that work differently. There is so much running, and so much hurting. The film’s writer didn’t seem to know when to throw in the towel. The oozing graphics grow as do the numbers of Arthur’s crazy social media followers. There is no stopping his trends.

This is a B-/C+ horror remake primarily because the seriousness lacked. The characters were intermittently off key as they came in and out of tune. While the violence was great, the characters did not roll well with it in my opinion. Perhaps audiences will appreciate the context and rank it higher than the disturbing elements. Overall, though, this is a films that I can only give two-and-a-half out of four stars.